Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) says it has penetrated US drone command and control networks, releasing footage of a US military aircraft bombing a hacked drone out of fear that it might end up in the hands of Iranian armed forces.
According to IRGC Aerospace Commander Brigadier General Amir-Ali Hajizadeh, the US drone was operating in Syria and Iraq when it was forced to make an emergency landing due to a problem it faced during flight.
The drone was landed with difficulty in a desert area 10 km away from a US base, a report by Fars news agency said.
“However, the Americans did not dare to approach their own drone” and had to bomb it with a warplane, it added.
“Seven or eight aerial vehicles with regular flights in Syria and Iraq were under our control; we could monitor their data, and managed to acquire their first-hand information,” General Hajizadeh said.
The footage released by the IRGC first shows the US drone facing a technical failure, and then a second drone sent by the US military to monitor the first UAV, and capture its destruction by a US jet fighter.
Iran famously grounded a US unmanned aerial vehicle RQ-170 Sentinel in December 2011 using electronic warfare techniques, as the stealth aircraft was flying over the Iranian city of Kashmar near the Afghan border.
Back in November 2018, General Hajizadeh highlighted the Islamic Republic’s drone intelligence, saying Iran now knows in which hangar of the US’ Kandahar Airfield in Afghanistan the RQ-170 had been deployed.
An IRGC commander says Iranian missiles can target the US bases in neighboring countries and its aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf.
According to the IRGC Aerospace commander, Iran used the reverse-engineered version of the RQ-170 drone to target Daesh positions in Syria and Iraq.
Iran currently possesses the biggest collection of captured or downed American and Israeli drones, including the US’ MQ1, MQ9, Shadow, ScanEagle, and RQ-170 as well as the Israeli regime’s Hermes, Hajizadeh added.
The Israeli drone was intercepted and shot down in October 2014 by IRGC forces on its way to the Natanz nuclear facility in the central Isfahan province.
In the field of unmanned aerial vehicles, Iran is now one of the world’s top four or five countries, and the top drone power in the region, General Hajizadeh said.
“The Iranian-made Shahed-129 drone, for example, had round-the-clock flights over terrorists’ positions in Syria and Iraq, and its services were also used by the Syrian army, the Russians, the Hezbollah forces, and others,” he added.
Iran’s UAV program has expanded in recent years with more than a dozen models operating for a variety of functions ranging from surveillance to intelligence gathering, carrying bombs and Kamikaze operations.
They have been playing a significant role in the fight against Takfiri terrorists as well as monitoring US warships in the Persian Gulf.
There is no shortage of patients curing their cancer on their own, with a little help from a medicinal plant we call cannabis. Recently, a 52-year-old woman from the United Kingdom revealed that cannabis oil saved her life. After a terminal cancer diagnosis and failed chemotherapy treatments, Joy Smith says that she was willing to try just about anything — including cannabis.
In spite of her initial skepticism, Smith took a leap of faith that seems to have paid off in huge dividends. Two years after beginning treatment with cannabis oil, her stomach cancer is in complete remission and the last bits of cancer are just about gone.
Smith, who hails from Coventry, says that doctors predicted she had just six weeks to live when they first diagnosed her stomach and bowel cancer. Many of the tumors were deemed inoperable, and experts pushed her to try chemotherapy to extend her life. But, as is so often the case, chemo just made her condition worse: She developed sepsis and her line had to be taken out.
It was then that she learned some of her friends had been looking into alternative treatments for her — including cannabis.
Smith told the Coventry Telegraph, “When you’re told you have six weeks to live you’ll try anything, trust me.”
“I was a bit sceptical about the oil at first as I’d never taken drugs or anything like that – but I know I would not be here today without it. I want to tell everybody,” she continued.
“Cannabis oil should be legalised for medical purposes – people are dying and the chemotherapy isn’t curing them,” the cancer survivor contended.
While Joy may have been apprehensive about cannabis oil initially, learning about other people who had success treating their cancer with it inspired her to be more confident. Soon, she saw her own results — which ultimately convinced her of the plant’s potency against one of the world’s leading killer diseases.
“I was taking it on and off. But when I’d been having it three to five times a week, the scans were getting better and then when I stopped taking it the scans showed no change,” she explained.
Why are governments continuing to outlaw this safe, affordable and highly effective solution against cancer?
“Widespread awareness and legalization of cannabis as anti-cancer medicine would collapse the for-profit cancer industry which depends on a never-ending supply of cancer patients for their profits and government funding,” explained Mike Adams, the “Health Ranger,” publisher of Cancer.news and other medical science news sites. “For millions of people around the world, the answer to cancer is literally a weed that grows for free, yet tyrannical governments around the world are beholden to the financial interests of the corrupt cancer industry, and they enforce prohibition against natural medicine, denying the populations of the world a basic human right: access to natural medicine,” Adams added.
Joy has described herself as a “walking miracle” after doctors in Spain confirmed that the cannabis oil was healing her cancer.
But, unsurprisingly, other members of the mainstream medical community have shunned her treatment protocol. Julie Frater, from Cancer Research UK, reportedly commented, “We don’t advise patients to use cannabis oil or any alternative therapies to treat cancer. Standard medical treatments for cancer are all evidence-based so have been tested to see how safe and effective they are.”
Of course, recent research has shown that chemotherapy is anything but safe; it can actually make cancer spread faster and become more virulent than it was before. As Joy Smith’s case has shown, chemo isn’t the godsend the medical community purports it to be.
The truth may be suppressed by mainstream medicine, but many people are turning to cannabis oil and other natural remedies in an effort to fight off their cancer — and there is no shortage of success. In September 2017, another brave woman revealed that cannabis oil had cured her “incurable” brain cancer. As usual, where modern “medicine” fails, plants rule.
Another cancer survivor came forward earlier this year, to tell the world that plant medicine had cured her breast cancer in just five months.
Despite the clear volume of people successfully treating cancer with cannabis, the mainstream medical establishment refuses to even consider the possibility of plant medicine. Who is truly being anti-science here?
For more stories about plant medicines and other natural remedies, check out NaturalMedicine.news and HealthFreedom.news.
Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and others have been receiving millions in drug money according to convicted Drug Lord El Chapo’s testimony at his sentencing hearing last week.
No wonder the Democrats have been pushing so hard against building a Border Wall. This should come as no surprise according to Ben Fulford. His CIA sources claimed that for years politicians have been regularly receiving huge bribes from a illegal drug industry http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=117525
President Trump to the rescue. His national emergency declaration allowed US and Canadian Special Forces to be called up. “Trump can now direct military operations in cities to remove false flag threats, arrest cabal and foreign agents, close overseas bases, get the Army Corps of Engineers to build a wall, order troops home, and bring military tribunals into the national conversation,” Fulford stated.
Pelosi, Schiff and a multitude of others appeared about to be headed to GITMO, while Clinton was believed already under indictment for a multitude of crimes. To make mass arrests, prepare for FISA declassification and “intel dumps,” Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator Brock Long was fired and Attorney General William Barr was sworn in before Trump declared the national emergency, Pentagon sources said.
Speaker of the House Democrat Nancy Pelosi was expected to be charged for not only being paid millions by Mafia King Pin El Chapo, but for an attempted coup on President Trump and her connections to the treasonous Uranium One deal with Russia.
7 of the Most Impractical and Unreliable Suvs Money Can Buy
Sponsored by Revcontent
Find Out More >
Former First Lady-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was suspected to not only be charged for receiving $15 million in drug money from Mafia King Pin El Chapo, but for her involvement in Clinton Foundation Crimes including Uranium One and Fusion GPS; directing and financing the Russian collusion ‘dossier’ to obtain so-called evidence in order to obtain a FISC sign-off that generated a two year investigation into Trump that produced no evidence of collusion. Worse, Hillary and Bill Clinton were believed connected to 58 homicide/suicides, many of whom were set to testify against the Clintons. Hillary was also expected to be charged with the Benghazi Massacre, Mass Murder in Haiti, Human Trafficking, Child Exploitation, Pedophilia and Election Fraud. According to New York police who reviewed former congressman Anthony Weiner’s server, Clinton and her assistant and ex-wife of Weiner Huma Abedin, produced a Snuff Film on the Dark Web that showed them terrorizing and killing a young girl and then drinking her blood. Clinton was also a frequent guest of the infamous “Lolita Express” that regularly flew political elites to Jeffrey Epstein’s “Pedophile Island” where children were believed regularly tortured and murdered.
Back on June 20 2018 Congress demanded the arrest of Hillary Clinton according to this News Conference video: https://youtu.be/tIvyE2JeJj0
Presently there were 49 global elites residing at GITMO awaiting trials, 40 of whom have not yet been charged according to C-Vine reporters for the military tribunals at GITMO and other secret military courts across the nation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPOArXwrxLQ
The tribunals began Jan. 2 with a court on 9/11. According to another reporter, David Zublick, former President George Bush Jr. has already given his testimony in a deposition for that trial. Another trial would begin on March 18. Transcripts and videos of the tribunals would eventually be released.
Since President Trump took office Attorney General for Utah John Huber and his 740 investigators have filed over 76,492 sealed indictments in federal courts across the nation. An estimated 80 to 140 Congress people were said named on those indictments (85% to 95% of whom were thought Democrats).
U.S. Attorney Huber Moving to Indict Clintons and Others:
Feb. 17 2019 Who’s who in the Unsealed Federal Criminal Indictments: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit?fbclid=IwAR1at543B1R5rQGc8Xc4B2qgQ8DrgdngQym1DVa3TUWCLJLdqFHvgJKUfQY#gid=1987600981
Celebrity pop-astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is watching his career swirl the toilet following numerous allegations from four different women who say he sexually assaulted them.
Tyson’s “StarTalk” show, which would have been cruising along in its fifth season, has reportedly been shelved until all details come forward about his improprieties. At that time, National Geographic, the network that airs “StarTalk” will then decide whether or not to keep the show going, or kill it for good.
“In order to allow the investigation to occur unimpeded we chose to hold new episodes of ‘Star Talk’ until it is complete,” a spokesperson from Fox Network Group stated. “We expect that to happen in the next few weeks at which time we’ll make a final decision.”
As we earlier reported, Tyson’s reputation took a major hit back in December when his latest accuser went public with claims that he made inappropriate jokes and sexually solicited her while drunk at an American Museum of Natural History holiday party.
“Tyson, its most famous employee, drunkenly approached her, she said, making sexual jokes and propositioning her to join him alone in his office,” BuzzFeed News reported at the time.
Another woman, Tchiya Amet, says that Tyson drugged and raped her while the two attended graduate school at The University of Texas at Austin, leaving her “traumatized for decades,” according to Newsweek.
“I went to [Neil deGrasse Tyson’s] apartment to visit like I did almost every day. He was like my big brother, or so I thought,” Amet told reporters.
“He offered me a glass of water. I accepted a liquid in a cup made out of a coconut shell. I recall coming back to consciousness briefly, then next thing I remember is seeing him in the hallway the next day. I have lived in this nightmare for 30 years, and it stops today,” she added.
Check out Twisted.news for more stories like this one.
Neil deGrasse Tyson cancels all live appearances in response to his show getting shelved
Tyson, of course, denies these and the other similar allegations made against him by other women, claiming that his actions were somehow misconstrued or exaggerated. He insists that he’s innocent, despite the fact that at least one of the alleged incidents was reported to a “harassment hotline” at the time, and isn’t simply a bandwagon accusation without merit.
In the meantime, Tyson is having to lay low and accept the fact that his shows might be cancelled in response to these scandals. Tyson is also reportedly going to skip out on several live appearances he was supposed to make in the coming months, including one in Tampa Bay and another in Orlando.
In the case of Neil deGrasse Tyson, it makes sense to #BelieveWomen
As the world awaits the findings of the investigation into the claims against Tyson, it’s important to remember that this fake science guru is a tried-and-true member of the political establishment – which means it’s highly unlikely that he’s being targeted with fake news in the same way as someone like Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
A close buddy of the Obamas, Tyson remains a valuable asset to the deep state, perpetuating lies about the “safety” of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), for instance, and the “non-existence” of God. In other words, he’s someone the deep state has an interest in protecting, not targeting for destruction.
“Sexual assault allegations against celebrities who are opposed to the scientific status quo must always be taken with a grain of salt, given that ‘negative P.R.’ companies are hired by the vaccine and GMO industries to try to destroy the reputations of independent scientists who question the status quo,” writes Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
“But when sexual allegations surface against people like Tyson who are shameless promoters of the status quo, they automatically carry more weight because it’s impossible for such allegations to have been fabricated by the very industries that Tyson promotes.”
President dealt a blow to Planned Parenthood and other clinics with a new pro-life Title X rule on Friday.
President Donald Trump energized the pro-life movement on Friday when his administration announced it plans to cut off millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers with a final rule revising the revamped Title X program.
The new rule “prohibits the use of Title X funds to perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning,” according to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) website.
Taxpayer-funded health care providers that offer abortions or refer women to other providers for abortions will no longer be eligible for these federal funds, according to the final rule.
In order to receive the Title X Family Planning grants, these women’s health care providers must be “physically and financially” cut off from abortion services.
The new rule does not, however, prevent the “nondirective pregnancy counseling, including nondirective counseling on abortion,” according to HHS.
Such counseling is simply no longer required.
The revisions will go into effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, according to HHS.
Pro-life advocates and many Republican lawmakers have long called for the federal defunding of Planned Parenthood. And Friday’s new Title X rule marks a significant step toward that goal.
“It is absolutely appropriate that the new Title X regulations take into account the difference between abortion and healthcare,” March for Life President Jeanne Mancini said in a statement on Friday. “Abortion is neither health care nor family planning which is why the Title X program has no business funding it.”
Mancini said that March for Life applauds the Trump administration “on this move that protects American taxpayers from paying for abortion through Title X.” She noted that women will “benefit from better regulatory oversight, a wider range of services, and more life-affirming options.”
“The new Title X regulations are a win-win for all Americans,” Mancini said.
Susan B. Anthony List (SBA) List President Marjorie Dannenfelser thanked President Trump in a statement for “taking decisive action to disentangle taxpayers from the big abortion industry led by Planned Parenthood.”
“The Protect Life Rule does not cut family planning funding by a single dime, and instead directs tax dollars to entities that provide healthcare to women but do not perform abortions,” Dannenfelser said.
Dannenfelser argued that the Title X program “was not intended to be a slush fund for abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood, which violently ends the lives of more than 332,000 unborn babies a year and receives almost $60 million a year in Title X taxpayer dollars.”
“We thank President Trump and (HHS) Secretary [Alex] Azar for ensuring that the Title X program is truly about funding family planning, not abortion,” She continued.
But Planned Parenthood President Leana Wen pledged — through a series of tweets — to “fight this rule with everything we have.”
“The implications of the Trump-Pence administration’s attack on Title X with a gag rule are staggering. It compromises the oath I took to serve my patients and help them make the best decisions about their health,” Wen wrote.
Wen insisted that abortion is “standard medical health care.”
She also accused “the Trump-Pence administration” of carrying out “an attack on poor women and people of color” with the Title X rule.
“Planned Parenthood is proud to serve 41% of the 4 million people who rely on Title X health centers. We will always be here for our patients. We will fight this rule with everything we have,” Wen warned.
The revelation that top Justice officials considered unseating Trump should answer that question for good…
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
That’s a natural reaction to the revelation of Andrew G. McCabe, the former deputy FBI director, that top Justice Department officials, alarmed by Donald Trump’s firing of former Bureau director James Comey, explored a plan to invoke the 25th Amendment and kick the duly elected president out of office.
According to New York Times reporters Adam Goldman and Matthew Haag, McCabe made the statement in an NBC 60 Minutes interview to be aired on Sunday. He also reportedly said that McCabe wanted the so-called Russia collusion investigation to go after Trump for obstructing justice in firing Comey and for any instances they could turn up of his working in behalf of Russia.
The idea of invoking the 25th Amendment was discussed, it seems, at two meetings on May 16, 2017. According to McCabe, top law enforcement officials pondered how they might recruit Vice President Pence and a majority of cabinet members to declare in writing, to the Senate’s president pro tempore and the House speaker, that the president was “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” That would be enough, under the 25th Amendment, to install the vice president as acting president, pushing aside Trump.
But to understand what kind of constitutional crisis this would unleash and the precedent it would set, it’s necessary to ponder the rest of this section of the 25th Amendment. The text prescribes that, if the president, after being removed, transmits to the same congressional figures that he is indeed capable of discharging his duties, he shall once again be president after four days. But if the vice president and the cabinet majority reiterate their declaration within those four days that the guy can’t govern, Congress is charged with deciding the issue. It then takes a two-thirds vote of both houses to keep the president removed, which would have to be done within 21 days, during which time the elected president would be sidelined and the vice president would govern. If Congress can’t muster the two-thirds majority within the prescribed time period, the president “shall resume the powers and duties of his office.”
It’s almost impossible to contemplate the political conflagration that would ensue under this plan. Citizens would watch those in Washington struggle with the monumental question of the fate of their elected leader under an initiative that had never before been invoked, or even considered, in such circumstances. Debates would flare up over whether this comported with the original intent of the amendment; whether it was crafted to deal with physical or mental “incapacitation,” as opposed to controversial actions or unsubstantiated allegations or even erratic decision making; whether such an action, if established as precedent, would destabilize the American republic for all time; and whether unelected bureaucrats should arrogate to themselves the power to set in motion the downfall of a president, circumventing the impeachment language of the Constitution.
For the past two years, the country has been struggling to understand the two competing narratives of the criminal investigation of the president.
One narrative—let’s call it Narrative A—has it that honorable and dedicated federal law enforcement officials developed concerns over a tainted election in which nefarious Russian agents had sought to tilt the balloting towards the candidate who wanted to improve U.S.-Russian relations and who seemed generally unseemly. Thus did the notion emerge, quite understandably, that Trump had “colluded” with Russian officials to cadge a victory that otherwise would have gone to his opponent. This narrative is supported and protected by Democratic figures and organizations, by adherents of the “Russia as Threat” preoccupation, and by anti-Trumpers everywhere, particularly news outlets such as CNN, The Washington Post, and The New York Times
The other view—Narrative B—posits that certain bureaucratic mandarins of the national security state and the outgoing Obama administration resolved early on to thwart Trump’s candidacy. After his election, they determined to undermine his political standing, and particularly his proposed policy toward Russia, through a relentless and expansive investigation characterized by initial misrepresentations, selective media leaks, brutal law enforcement tactics, and a barrage of innuendo. This is the narrative of most Trump supporters, conservative commentators, Fox News, and The Wall Street Journal editorial page, notably columnist Kimberley Strassel.
The McCabe revelation won’t affect the battle of the two narratives. As ominous and outrageous as this “deep state” behavior may seem to those who embrace Narrative B, it will be seen by Narrative A adherents as evidence that those law enforcement officials were out there heroically on the front lines protecting the republic from Donald J. Trump.
And those Narrative A folks won’t have any difficulty tossing aside the fact that McCabe was fired as deputy FBI director for violating agency policy in leaking unauthorized information to the news media. He then allegedly violated the law in lying about it to federal investigators on four occasions, including three times while under oath.
Indeed, Narrative A people have no difficulty at all brushing aside serious questions posed by Narrative B people. McCabe is a likely liar and perjurer? Doesn’t matter. Peter Strzok, head of the FBI’s counterespionage section, demonstrated his anti-Trump animus in tweets and emails to Justice official Lisa Page? Irrelevant. Christopher Steele’s dossier of dirt on Trump, including an allegation that the Russians were seeking to blackmail and bribe him, was compiled by a man who had demonstrated to a Justice Department official that he was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and…passionate about him not being president”? Not important. The dossier was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party? Immaterial. Nothing in the dossier was ever substantiated? So what?
Now we have a report from a participant of those meetings that top officials of the country’s premier law enforcement entity sat around and pondered how to bring down a sitting president they didn’t like. The Times even says that McCabe “confirmed” an earlier report that deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein suggested wearing a wire in meetings with Trump to incriminate him and make him more vulnerable to the plot.
There is no suggestion in McCabe’s interview pronouncements or in the words of Scott Pelley, who conducted the interview and spoke to CBS This Morning about it, that these federal officials ever took action to further the aim of unseating the president. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence that they approached cabinet members or the vice president about it. “They…were speculating, ‘This person would be with us, this person would not be,’ and they were counting noses in that effort,” said Pelley. He added, apparently in response to Rosenstein’s insistence that his comments about wearing a wire were meant as a joke, “This was not perceived to be a joke.”
What are we to make of this? Around the time of the meetings to discuss the 25th Amendment plot, senior FBI officials also discussed initiating a national security investigation of the president as a stooge of the Russians or perhaps even a Russian agent. These talks were revealed by The New York Times and CNN in January, based on closed-door congressional testimony by former FBI general counsel James Baker. You don’t have to read very carefully to see that the reporters on these stories brought to them a Narrative A sensibility. The Times headline: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.” CNN’s: “Transcripts detail how FBI debated whether Trump was ‘following directions’ of Russia.” And of course, whoever leaked those hearing transcripts almost surely did so to bolster the Narrative A version of events.
The independent journalist Gareth Porter, writing at Consortium News, offers a penetrating exposition of the inconsistencies, fallacies, and fatuities of the Narrative A matrix, as reflected in how the Times and CNN handled the stories that resulted from what were clearly self-interested leaks.
Porter notes that a particularly sinister expression in May 2017 by former CIA director John O. Brennan, a leading Trump antagonist, has precipitated echoes in the news media ever since, particularly in the Times. Asked in a committee hearing if he had intelligence indicating that anyone in the Trump campaign was “colluding with Moscow,” Brennan dodged the question. He said his experience had taught him that “the Russians try to suborn individuals, and they try to get them to act on their behalf either wittingly or unwittingly.”
Of course you can’t collude with anybody unwittingly. But Brennan’s fancy expression has the effect of expanding what can be thrown at political adversaries, to include not just conscious and nefarious collaboration but also policy advocacy that could be viewed as wrongheaded or injurious to U.S. interests. As Porter puts it, “The real purpose…is to confer on national security officials and their media allies the power to cast suspicion on individuals on the basis of undesirable policy views of Russia rather than on any evidence of actual collaboration with the Russian government.”
That seems to be what’s going on here. There’s no doubt that McCabe and Rosenstein and Strzok and Brennan and Page and many others despised Trump and his resolve to thaw relations with Russia. They viewed him as a president “who needed to be reined in,” as a CNN report described the sentiment among top FBI officials after the Comey firing.
So they expanded the definition of collusion to include “unwitting” collaboration in order to justify their machinations. It’s difficult to believe that people in such positions would take such a cavalier attitude toward the kind of damage they could wreak on the body politic.
Now we learn that they actually sat around and plotted how to distort the Constitution, just as they distorted the rules of official behavior designed to hold them in check, in order to destroy a presidential administration placed in power by the American people. It’s getting more and more difficult to dismiss Narrative B.
America slays Innocents but fights to save the lives of murderers, as Sodom and Gomorra was destroyed for being corrupt and pure evil, pastor Lankford explains that Judgement shall come, to avenge the blood of the innocent.
A researcher on GodlikeProductions spliced the audio together from known clips of Sandy Hoax supposed shooter Adam Lanza with our favorite gun grabber David Hogg (Daddy in the FBI) and what do you know – a perfect match! Listen for yourself!
Leonard Pozner, the “Dad” of one of the kids who supposedly died at Sandy Hook sued Wolfgang Halbig for saying his son didn’t die but when the court demanded he be made to answer questions Wolfgang had for him under oath, he backed down like a coward and dropped his suit after costing Wolfgang a fortune to defend himself of course! A Real dad who lost their son would NEVER drop out of a suit like this! I know I sure wouldn’t if I was in his position! Open the Video
Here’s proof of what happened in court! Note Alex Jones never covered this of course and Alex’s attorney told him to never call them again! But he’s the tip of the spear and will save us right?
“The chance to question Pozner under the watchful eye of a video camera never arrived, however, as Pozner dismissed his complaint the afternoon he was required to provide the discovery answers, leaving Halbig with a big legal bill and a shuttered website. Halbig says he will countersue for attorney’s fees and costs.”
Here’s the clips of “Adam Lanza” calling into a radio show as “Greg”. Adam Lanza sounds and looks exactly like David Hogg! Open the Video
The idea that climate change is producing heat records across the Earth is among the most egregious manipulations of data in the absurd global warming debate.
Americans receive a daily barrage from the fake news media and climate “experts” reporting that each and every day, week, month or year is the hottest on record due to global warming. On Feb. 7, several major newspapers carried stories of the declaration by NASA and NOAA that the past five years have been the warmest on record.
Sadly, these supposed experts use mathematical equations that do not jibe with reality over the past 140 years.
The same climate experts warn that record heat is just the tip of the iceberg. We are constantly told that global warming is the root cause behind any and all weather events that are extreme, destructive, unusual or uncomfortable.
Many of these fear mongers also say we should stop burning fossil fuels that are causing this mayhem.
Is the Earth truly experiencing the hottest weather on record?
Advertisement – story continues below
Actual weather records over the past 100 years show no correlation between rising carbon dioxide levels and local temperatures.
However, climate change alarmists always find somewhere on Earth where temperatures are higher than ever. The focus is always on isolated temperatures that have reached all-time highs while the same reports ignore all-time record lows. These zealots would like you to believe that due to fossil fuel emissions, summers are now longer and hotter while winters are shorter and milder.
Yet, the actual temperature records tell a very different story. Did the Earth experience its highest temperature ever this year? The answer is no.
The highest temperature ever reported was 136 degrees Fahrenheit in Libya in 1922. The record high temperature for the United States was 134 degrees Fahrenheit in Death Valley, California, in 1913. Fossil fuel emissions in 1913 and 1922 were negligible compared to today.
The coldest temperature ever reported was 129 degrees below zero Fahrenheit in Vostok, Antarctica, in 1983, when Carbon dioxide emissions were five times higher than in 1913. The coldest temperature in the lower 48 states of minus 64 degrees Fahrenheit was recorded in 1996 in Embarass, Minnesota. Did the media and climate scientists warn that this low temperature indicated that we are headed for another Ice Age?
The maximum reported difference between high and low temperatures at a single location is 188 degrees Fahrenheit (from minus 90F to plus 98F) in Verhoyansk, Siberia. In fact, record changes of highs and lows have occurred in 22 U.S. cities on a single day. For example, in 1989 the temperature in Alamosa, Colorado, varied between a low of 35F and a high of 91F for a temperature swing of 56 degrees F.
We hope these examples, right out of the weather record books, compiled by C.C. Burt in his book “Extreme Weather Changes,” will help you to understand the scams alarmists are trying to pull. These examples all illustrate that cherry picking record high temperatures in isolated locations tells absolutely nothing about the Earth’s climate.
The strongest heat wave ever recorded occurred in July 1936, generating high temperatures in half of America’s states. In 1935, fossil fuel emissions were 96 percent lower than today. America’s coldest year occurred in 1899, when temperatures dropped below 0 F in all 48 states.
Interesting that the figure above shows the most severe historic cold wave during the past century took place in 1936, which was the same year when the strongest heat wave took place. In terms of general behavior, the global warming alarmist prediction is that as time progresses and fossil fuel emissions increase, the number of record highs should increase and record lows should decrease. However, these trends do not exist and the data dispels, rather than supports, the global warming hypothesis.
Concurrently a compilation of all days since 1915 when temperatures exceeded 90F shows them decreasing with time rather than increasing in Figure 2.
The heat wave experienced in the 1930s and 1950s are clearly evident here. Once again, the data does not support the claim that the United States is hotter than ever as a result of rising Carbon dioxide levels.
From 1970 until 1998 there was a warming period that raised temperatures by about 0.7 F that helped spawn the global warming alarmist movement. However, since 1998, little warming has occurred while carbon dioxide emissions continue to increase. This is totally consistent with variations in the amount of heat the Earth receives from the Sun.
These facts are completely supported by 4,000 ocean floats which measure ocean temperatures at a variety of depths. This data at argo.ucsd.edu measures the oceans where climate-induced temperatures occur.
Isn’t it time to start ignoring the calamitous annual claims that this is the hottest year on record? It just ain’t so.
Jay Lehr (firstname.lastname@example.org) is director of science at The Heartland Institute. Tom Harris (email@example.com) is executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition.
A treasonous coup attempt to over throw duly elected President Donald Trump was about to be made public in FISA document declassification next week. Defendants such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, former directors of the FBI and CIA, plus other political elites were said named in the federal indictments about to go on trial. The same political elites were said to be headed to, or were presently at GITMO for their military tribunals.
Rumored as named defendants in the treasonous coup were former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former National Intelligence Director James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Agent Lisa Page.
Evidently McCabe had already faced a military tribunal, was under court order to disclose “semi-truths” to the public and did as ordered. On Sunday Feb. 17 he disclosed on Twenty Minutes that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has been intent on wiring himself for meetings in the White House and conversations with Trump. That same Feb. 17 CBS’s Face the Nation found Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham announcing he would subpoena both McCabe and Rosenstein for hearings to determine whether top Justice Department and FBI officials discussed a “bureaucratic coup” to remove President Trump from office – an act of Treason. Earlier that day Rosenstein had announced his resignation for mid-March.
Since President Trump took office Attorney General for Utah John Huber and his 740 investigators have filed over 76,492 sealed indictments in federal courts across the nation. An estimated 80 to 140 Congress people were said named on those indictments (85% to 95% of whom were thought Democrats). The FISA Report was said to be the first major indictment to be unsealed.
Although, there was another that preceded it. Former President George Bush Jr. was said to be named as one of the defendants in the 9/11 crimes. After 18 years of wait, Tribunals on 9/11 finally began at GITMO on Jan. 28. Pre-trials had already begun on five other defendants of the 9/11 crimes – trials that were subsequently delayed until March because of Military Court Judge Colonel Parrella’s medical problems.
Bush, Obama, Clinton and George Soros among others, were suspected to presently reside at GITMO in a new $69 million special prison called Camp 7 that was designed to hold 15 high value detainees.
Charges on the over 76,492 indictments included violation of the Espionage Act of 1912, High Treason, Election Fraud, Child Sex Trafficking, Homicide, Pornography, Money Laundering, Bribery, Perjury, crimes of Uranium One, 9/11, Cover Up of 9/11, March 11 2011 Fukushima Nuclear and Tsunami mass murders, Benghazi Massacre, Hijacking of Malaysian Air 370, Mass Murder in Haiti and elsewhere, Gun and Drug running, Human Trafficking, Child Exploitation, kidnapping, harvesting victim’s organs for monetary gain; election fraud, blackmail for votes on political issues through recording of pedophilia parties where children were raped, tortured and murdered, misappropriation and confiscation of US taxpayer monies through use of the illegal and privately owned Federal Reserve, IRS, US Corporation, City of London and Holy See, plus not implementing the freedom from debt GESARA Law signed into law by the US Supreme Court and President Bill Clinton.
Some tribunals were taking place in secret military facilities such as in South Carolina. At least two, if not seven, FEMA prison barges had been prepared to hold prisoners for the Military Tribunals. Trump had spent around $200 million to renovate GITMO for arrival of political elite prisoners.
On March 1, 2018 President Trump signed Executive Order allowing military tribunals to take place – that were said being held in secret on different military bases including GITMO. Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, General James Mattis and General John Kelly were in charge of the tribunals.