It would be naive to think that the FDA endeavors to protect the public’s health as its primary focus. Indeed, that would be a conflict of interest, as it serves its master, the pharmaceutical industry. Has the Food and Drug Administration engineered a shortage of intravenous vitamin C as part of an overall attack on natural and non-toxic approaches to healing that compete with prescription drugs? An analysis by Natural Blaze would suggest that the answer is yes.
Natural Blaze claims that a critical shortage of IV bags in general followed an FDA ban on the mass production of intravenous vitamin C. The FDA limited the availability of IV-C and the pharmaceutical industry halted production of injectable vitamins and minerals, after a 60 minute story about the miraculous recovery of a swine flu patient on life support. Because of the shortage of IV-C, doctors called upon compounding pharmacies to produce it. But the FDA began to limit compounding pharmacies after injectable steroids produced by the New England Compounding Center were contaminated with a fungus that caused a deadly outbreak of meningitis. Here is an example of an entire industry being punished for the dubious practices of one compounding pharmacy.
Try and follow this convoluted story: Doctors began to source NECC for its more expensive product because cheaper generic versions were in short supply. But it was the FDA’s increased inspection of drug factories that disrupted the supply chain in the first place. So the meningitis deaths were in part caused by the onerous actions of the FDA.
Natural Blaze reports, “… without anyone noticing, and by many indirect means of banning production of the bags or shutting down those doing the production of the bags and the injectable vitamins and minerals, access to IV solutions for innumerable treatments for diseases, have gone into critical shortage.”
Vitamin C and the Big C
Could the shortage of IV-C be part of an effort to limit alternative cancer therapies?
DrWhitaker.com states, “… vitamin C is a potent antioxidant that has the power to boost immune function, increase resistance to infection, and protect against a wide range of diseases. But there’s an entirely different and largely unknown role of vitamin C, and that is its ability—when administered in very high doses by intravenous (IV) infusions—to kill cancer cells. … Best of all—and unlike virtually all conventional chemotherapy drugs that destroy cancer cells—it is selectively toxic. No matter how high the concentration, vitamin C does not harm healthy cells.”
Dr. Whitaker continues:
“The only way to get blood levels of vitamin C to the concentrations required to kill cancer cells is to administer it intravenously. … For example, 10 g of IV vitamin C raises blood levels 25 times higher than the same dose taken orally, and this increases up to 70-fold as doses get larger.”
Choose health, choose life
When the human body is challenged by pathogens or needs to heal from injuries or surgery, its requirement for vitamin C increases considerably. If hospitals routinely administered intravenous ascorbic acid, a proven and inexpensive treatment, patient outcomes would improve. When one weighs the risk of infection from deadly superbugs in hospitals today, IV vitamin C as a preventative safeguard makes all the more sense.
To learn how to secure IV-C in advance of a hospital stay for yourself or a family member, check out this very useful advice at DoctorYourself.com. You will learn how to deal with objections from physicians and hospital administrators regarding this “alt-health” remedy. It will require some moxie, but doing so may save a life.
Supporters of Obamacare believe that access to affordable healthcare is the most important consideration. But of even greater concern should be the ability to choose your own treatment modality, such as IV-C. In other words, medical freedom of choice trumps universal access. Many of us involved in the health freedom movement are outraged by the disregard for our natural rights by unelected federal bureaucracies such as the FDA. We hope for a day when a critical mass of aware citizens will hold their elected officials accountable to overturn toxic policies that favor Big Pharma’s obscene profits over our health and well-being. And that day is long overdue.
New research out of the University of California, Berkeley has revealed that many conventional shampoo, soap, and toothpaste products are loaded with endocrine-disrupting chemicals, or EDCs, that damage hormones in developing children.
Young girls, the study found, are reaching puberty much earlier than normal as a result of exposure to these EDCs. And boys, it further found, are similarly experiencing reductions in testosterone levels from simple use of contaminated products.
Published in the journal Human Reproduction, the paper was compiled from data collected as part of the Centre for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas (CHAMACOS), which followed 338 children from pre-birth into adolescence to assess the impact of various environmental exposures.
What they determined is that, over the past 20 years, the average age at which children are reaching puberty is getting increasingly earlier – and a major culprit are personal care products that contain chemicals known to interfere with normal hormone expression.
“We know that some of the things we put on our bodies are getting into our bodies, either because they pass through the skin or we breathe them in or we inadvertently ingest them,” stated Kim Harley, the study’s lead author and an associate adjunct professor in Berkeley’s School of Public Health.
“We need to know how these chemicals are affecting our health.”
Chemicals in personal care products causing ovarian cancer in girls and testicular cancer in boys
While the average age for girls reaching puberty is normally around 11, exposure to EDCs in personal care products is bringing that down to around eight – or even earlier. Scientists describe this negative phenomenon as “precocious” puberty, which is known to cause social troubles and increase the likelihood of young girls engaging in risky behavior.
Among the EDCs that cause this are phthalates, parabens, and phenols, three common personal care product chemicals that are known to mimic hormones in the human body. When rubbed on skin or used orally, products that contain such chemicals can leach them into the body, causing adolescent youth of both sexes to mature far too early.
“While more research is needed, people should be aware that there are chemicals in personal care products that may be disrupting the hormones in our bodies,” Harley added.
This same study also found that EDCs can damage the hormones of children who are exposed to them in the womb – meaning they’re not even directly exposed to them, but are rather having them passed down from their mothers.
EDCs also linked to autism in children
As we earlier reported, EDCs have also been linked to another widespread phenomenon that’s interfering with normal childhood development: autism.
A cohort of researchers from some of the top schools in the country looked at blood and urine samples from 175 pregnant women, and tracked them for up to five years. What they discovered is that exposure to EDCs prenatally increased the prevalence of autistic behavioral traits in children, beginning in the womb and extending into early childhood.
Shockingly, scientists uncovered an average of 44 different EDCs in each of the pregnant women, revealing just how prominent these chemicals are in consumer care products as well as in the environment. These include chemicals like brominated flame retardants from furniture; perfluorooctane, a coolant chemical; and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, a pesticide chemical used in conventional agriculture.
“With autism rates climbing in the United States between 2002 and 2012 by 78 percent, it seems that Americans are oblivious to the effect that these chemicals have on the human body, especially on developing minds,” our own L.J. Devon explained.
“Since boys are four times more likely than girls to develop autistic behaviors, the scientists concurred that several key hormones known to control male brain development are being disrupted by chemicals in the environment.”
For more related news, be sure to check out ChemicalViolence.news.
The vast majority of us have probably heard of chemtrails but don’t know very much about them. Others know exactly what they are but insist they are nothing but fodder for conspiracy theorists. And then there are those who adamantly insist that they are real and pose a serious risk to our health.
Those who believe that chemtrails are dangerous are adamant that they are actually clouds of chemicals that governmental and other agencies dispel in to the air to control the weather or dim the sun to combat “global warming.” It is believed that these toxic, man-made clouds contain high levels of hazardous heavy metals, including aluminum, arsenic and mercury. They are also referred to as “geoengineering” activities and are widely discussed in the scientific literature.
While we may not know what the purpose of chemtrails are, we can certainly protect ourselves against their effects by detoxifying our bodies from harmful chemicals.
So, what exactly are chemtrails?
For those of us who don’t know what they are, chemtrails – or chemical trails, as they are properly known – are the white trails we see remaining in the sky after planes fly overhead. Chemtrails are not to be confused with contrails, which are simply trails of condensed water seen as white streaks in the sky behind aircraft. Chemtrails are easy to identify because while contrails dissipate quickly, chemtrails linger in the sky, spreading out and making it look cloudy even when there are no real clouds in the sky.
Government officials will generally refuse to comment on chemtrails, but back in 2016 a NASA scientist admitted that the agency has been putting lithium in rocket exhaust so that it can be dispersed into the atmosphere since the 1970s, although he insisted that the lithium “is not dangerous.”
As reported by Waking Times, there are at least five natural weapons that can be used to detoxify the body from the chemical poisons released into the atmosphere by chemtrails.
This trace mineral is vital to the optimal functioning of the body, and has excellent antioxidant properties which protect against the damaging effects of exposure to pesticides and heavy metals. Waking Times reported:
Scientists have found that selenium can specifically bind to mercury and pull it from your tissues so it can be excreted.
This single-cell microalga binds to heavy metals in the digestive tract, purifying the body from toxins absorbed through breathing contaminated air — including air contaminated by chemtrails — and from drinking impure water.
This ancient life form detoxifies the digestive system in a similar way to chlorella, but goes a step further by alkalizing the body, protecting against acidic environmental toxins that cause disease.
This powerful plant contains the compound silybin which supports the functioning of the liver, the organ responsible for detoxification. Waking Times reported:
Supporting healthy liver function is absolutely essential when you’re exposed to such a large amount of harmful substances on a daily basis. Otherwise, the liver can get overwhelmed and sluggish. If this happens when you’re exposed to a toxin, it’s more likely to freely roam your body and cause a tremendous amount of damage.
Foods that detoxify:
Superfoods that help flush the body of toxic chemicals and heavy metals include cilantro, probiotic foods, ginger, citrus fruits, garlic and foods rich in alpha lipoic acids, like peas, Brussels sprouts and broccoli.
In conclusion, even if you don’t believe in chemtrails, there can be no doubt that all of us are exposed to toxic chemicals on a daily basis and that detoxifying with these natural remedies can only be of benefit to each one of us.
Apple and other tech companies have sold tens of millions of pairs of wireless earbuds over the past few years which a group of 250 scientists from over 40 countries is now warning may cause cancer.
Wireless technologies are appealing to consumers but may not be safe, experts warn.
The close proximity of the wireless earbuds to the brain may cause significant risk of cancer, as the Daily Mail reports.
According to University of California community health professor Dr. Joel Moskowitz, wireless earbuds “communicate with one another using a magnetic induction field, a variable magnetic field [one] sends through your brain to communicate with the other” which cannot be “great for you.”
The bottom line is, wireless earbuds are essentially still experimental and should not be fully trusted.
Will you continue to wear wireless earbuds despite the fact that over 250 scientists warn they may cause cancer?
Please follow and like us:
Other articles of interest:
WARNING: THE GOLD REALLY IS GONE. Please take this warning seriously. Your chance to protect your family may depend on it. We remind you of the very dire current situation with Canada’...
People often go on a cleanse or a detox diet to flush toxins from their body or to promote weight loss. When you’re on a detox, you need to eliminate toxins and eat healthier. To do this, you can add more fiber-rich and nutritious vegetables to your diet.
If you’re not sure where to start on your detox diet, start by eating more salads with fresh and organic greens such as:
Top your salad with chia seeds, hemp, shaved fennel, and spring radishes. But don’t use unhealthy bottled dressing. Instead, gently toss the salad with a couple of tablespoons of extra-virgin olive oil and lemon juice.
Alternatively, you can add a sprinkle of apple cider vinegar (ACV) as a dressing. ACV is another powerful detoxifier. If you want more crunch in your salad, add some nuts and seeds.
A healthy salad is a good source of vegetables, fiber, and healthy monounsaturated fat (from the olive oil or avocado). Eating more salads will also help you feel fuller longer.
Consume the following vegetables to eliminate toxins from your body.
Artichokes, which can naturally increase bile production, are full of antioxidants and vitamins C and K. These vegetables can provide at least 10 grams of fiber in just one choke (the fine, fuzzy filaments of the vegetable).
Artichokes can also promote weight loss. It takes a while to eat them, and there’s a lot of fiber in the leaves. The vegetables are also low in calories and fat.
To detox with artichokes, steam whole artichokes until they’re just tender. Combine butter, extra virgin olive oil, and lemon juice, then dip the base of the artichokes leaves in the mixture.
Beets are a popular blood cleanser, and they produce nitric acid that can help boost blood flow throughout your body. Beets or beet juice contains carotenes, phenolic acids, and vitamin E.
Beets also have betalains, a type of antioxidant that can help repair and regenerate the cells in your liver.
To make a cleansing salad, combine baby greens, beets, feta cheese, and grapefruit. You can also make a detoxifying beet juice by combining apples, beets, celery, lemon juice, and some sprigs of cilantro.
Research has revealed that “crunchy, anise-flavored” fennel can be used like celery in recipes. Fennel possesses antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, and it can help relieve gas and decrease bloating.
Fennel is full of amino acids, fatty acids, fiber, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and vitamin C. This vegetable is low in calories, making it the perfect detox food.
Use fennel to make a detoxifying juice by combining the vegetable with apples and carrots.
Seaweed is one of the most nutrient-dense vegetables, and it is full of antioxidants and phytochemicals such as polyphenols and fucoxanthin. Seaweeds like dulse, kombu, nori, and wakame are used as food sources in sea-dwelling communities.
Seaweeds are often used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat different health problems such as tumors and urinary tract infections (UTIs).
Seaweed is full of nutrients that can help detox your blood and kidneys. They also possess diuretic properties that can help you shed excess water while also strengthening your immune system.
In Ayurvedic and traditional Chinese medicine, turmeric is used to treat different diseases such as liver and digestive disorders. The spice helps detoxify the liver by increasing bile production in the gallbladder, and your liver then uses the bile to eliminate toxins and digest fats.
Turmeric has an active ingredient called curcumin, which is a polyphenol. Curcumin is a powerful anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial. Studies suggest that curcumin can help address different conditions such as Alzheimer’s, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancers, heavy metal poisoning, irritable bowel disease, and liver diseases.
Get your daily dose of turmeric by adding half a teaspoon to a smoothie.
Alternatively, you can toss cauliflower in olive oil with a bit of turmeric before roasting. Serve the sauteed cauliflower with Greek yogurt. (Related: Toxins all around? Get rid of them with proper detox.)
Fruits for a detox diet
Aside from the vegetables included in the list above, you can also eat fruits while detoxifying. Try to eat at least five to 10 servings of colorful fruits and vegetables every day when you’re going on a detox.
These fruits contain phytonutrients with antioxidant properties that can help boost your overall health:
Ashura is a bloody Shi’ite Muslim ritual where the men beat themselves to a bloody pulp. Muslims flagellate themselves and their children with whips and chains until bloody to lament the death of our former President’s namesake, Hussein. And they share knives, thereby bringing this new viral blood infection into Britain. More of the poison fruit of mass Muslim migration. Britain is lost, but why is this savagery tolerated in the US, considering that blood-borne illnesses are so hazardous? This should be banned as a matter of disease control. But it’s more important to adhere to and to respect the sharia and not offend Islam. That is the priority.
“Mystery infections traced to blood-shedding religious ritual,” by Mike Stobbe, Associated Press, March 13, 2019 (thanks to Wendy):
NEW YORK (AP) — Add self-flagellation to the list of ways to get a dangerous viral blood infection.
Researchers said Wednesday that they were initially puzzled how 10 British men had become infected with a little-known virus, because the men hadn’t taken risks usually associated with the infection.
But then investigators learned they had participated in blood-shedding religious rituals — cutting or whipping themselves — in Iraq, Pakistan, India and the United Kingdom.
“There have been suggestions that you might spread infections through this route, but it has never been described before” in a published medical study, said Dr. Divya Dhasmana of St. Mary’s Hospital in London….
The men were infected with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1. Most people infected with the virus never develop symptoms, but some develop terrible illnesses, like a deadly blood cancer or a debilitating nervous system condition.
HTLV-1 spreads through breastfeeding, sex, blood transfusion and sharing of needles. Experts have estimated that up to 10 million people worldwide are infected, though it is considered relatively rare in the United States and United Kingdom….
One ritual involves striking the forehead with a knife and then passing it along to other men. Another involves striking the back with a chain of blades or other bladed implement.
One man said that when he did it, the blades being passed around were soaked in a bucket containing an over-the-counter antiseptic solution. But that is inadequate to prevent spread of HTLV-1, Dhasmana said.
The practice of whipping or cutting oneself has been practiced among different religious groups, most notably by Shiite Muslims on the holy day Ashoura. Usually only men do it, and it’s controversial even within religious communities.
Dhasmana said: “Our message is not ‘Don’t do it.’ Our message is ‘If you do it, don’t share equipment.’”
California parents are demanding an elementary school remove their on-campus cell tower after four students and three teachers were diagnosed with cancer in just three years.
Some students at the Weston Elementary School in Ripon, San Joaquin County, California have been pulled from attending the school over the spike in cancer cases, reports the Sacramento Bee.
On Monday evening about 200 angered parents attended a Ripon school board meeting to demand action. The kindergarten-through-eighth-grade school has about 400 students.
The Ripon Unified School District said tests carried out on the cell tower showed it is working normally and within safety standards, but the board are talking with the telecommunications company about moving the tower.
Four students have been diagnosed with cancer since the controversy first erupted in 2016. Monica Ferrulli, a parent of one of the students who was treated for brain cancer in 2017, claimed the RUSD is in “denial” and citing an obsolete American Cancer Society study to justify the tower’s placement.
“We had a doctor tell us that it’s 100 percent environmental, the kind of tumor that he has,” said Ferrulli to CBS Sacramento, and added that an inspection of the tower arranged by parents showed much higher readings than the RUSD-hired engineers found in 2018.
The school district, who reportedly receives $2,000 per month for the tower, has said while they empathize with families, they have no out clause in their 25-year lease contract with Spirit – the company that owns the tower – meaning both the school district and Spirit will have to mutually agree on a relocation.
There are 7.7 billion people on this planet (as at March 2019). Only about 5 percent of them drink fluoridated water. Why? Because their governments recognize that fluoride in large amounts becomes a toxic chemical that is not fit for human consumption.
The 328,000,000 citizens of the United States drink more fluoridated water than all other countries combined. Why? Because the U.S. government continues to doggedly insist that it is safe and improves dental health.
But what do the facts say? As reported by Waking Times, dozens of peer-reviewed studies published in prestigious journals like The Lancet, have confirmed that fluoride is in fact toxic – especially to the developing brains of children. These chemicals are derived from unprocessed toxic waste which is not purified in any way before being pumped into the water supply. How could it possibly be anything but harmful?
The history of water fluoridation in the United States
So, what prompted the government to start adding something so obviously harmful to our precious water supply?
Waking Times, quoting from an article by The Children’s Health Defense Team, explains a little about the history of this practice:
During World War II, fluoride (a compound formed from the chemical element fluorine) came into large-scale production and use as part of the Manhattan Project. According to declassified government documents summarized by Project Censored, Manhattan Project scientists discovered early on that fluoride was a “leading health hazard to bomb program workers and surrounding communities.” In order to stave off lawsuits, government scientists “embarked on a campaign to calm the social panic about fluoride…by promoting its usefulness in preventing tooth decay.”
To back up its decision, the government embarked on a series of flawed and poorly designed “scientific” studies, which an expert later lambasted as “especially rich in fallacies, improper design, invalid use of statistical methods, omissions of contrary data, and just plain muddleheadedness and hebetude.”
They then used these sham studies to enforce a national policy of water fluoridation.
Studies confirm fluoride lowers IQ and harms children in other ways
Interestingly, even government-backed studies have confirmed the dangers of fluoride in drinking water. For example, a study published in 2017, which was largely funded by the government’s National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, uncovered a “strong relationship” between fluoride exposure in the womb and reduced cognitive function.
In addition, Natural News previously reported:
More than 50 peer-reviewed studies have linked the consumption of fluoridated water to lower IQ in children. A joint metanalysis by Harvard School of Public Health and China Medical University, which examined 27 studies on the subject, found “strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children.”
Fluoridation has also been linked to countless other devastating health effects in children, including premature birth, impaired neurological development, autism and preeclampsia. A recent study also confirmed a significant link between fluoridation and ADHD.
Death rates up to 26 percent higher in the most fluoridated states
And it gets worse. As reported by Waking Times, death rates among people who live in the 10 states with the highest fluoridation levels are between 5 and 26 percent higher than among people living in the 10 least fluoridated states.
Furthermore, studies have linked fluoridated water to cancer, damaging effects on the brain, and dental fluorosis, which experts agree is the first visible sign of fluoride toxicity.
The National Research Council of the National Academies also issued a warning in 2006 that fluoride exposure might be a risk factor in the development of Alzheimer’s disease.
And to top it all off, there is literally no evidence that fluoride even prevents cavities! Even if it did, would that small benefit really be worth the massive potential for serious health problems that fluoridation has been scientifically linked to?
Learn more at Fluoride.news or TapWater.news.
Please follow and like us:
Other articles of interest:
Las Vegas Mass Murderer Left NOTE The lack of information coming our of law enforcement and feds is criminal.
Photos emerge of Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock’s body….and there is...
Some foods can help your body become the healthiest and strongest it can be, and keep cancer and other diseases at bay. Multiple studies have shown that a variety of fresh, whole foods can make you feel at your best while giving your body the energy and building blocks it needs.
However, just as some foods protect us from diseases, others are the perfect recipe for disaster, wreaking havoc on your system — with cancer as a possible side-effect. With so much information out there, it’s often hard to know what’s safe and what’s not.
Many of us pay attention to food labels, but some foods are so commonly used and convenient — we often forget that they may house a host of toxic chemicals too. Here are some cancer-causing foods that specialists revealed they would never eat.
Tomatoes are abundant, inexpensive, and easy to grow. While canned tomatoes may be convenient, nothing beats the flavor and benefits you’ll get from a home-cooked meal with fresh, organic tomatoes. Fredrick Vom Saal, an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri, explained that the acidity of tomatoes causes bisphenol-A (BPA) from the lining in canned foods to seep into the food. BPA is a synthetic estrogen-like compound that has been linked to reproductive problems, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and cancer.
Olga Naidenko, a senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group, pointed to a recent study from UCLA that has linked chemicals found in the lining of popcorn bags to infertility issues in humans. These compounds have also been shown to cause liver, as well as testicular and pancreatic cancers in lab animals. (Related: Microwave popcorn gives off a toxic, lung-damaging gas when cooked.)
Jeffrey Moyer, chair of the National Organic Standards Board, noted that many potato growers would never eat their own potatoes because of the high levels of pesticides they absorb from the soil. Furthermore, after harvesting, these potatoes are sprayed again with questionable chemicals to prevent them from sprouting.
Farmed salmon are fed an unnatural diet of soy, poultry litter, and hydrolyzed chicken feathers, noted Dr. David Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany. Aside from lower levels of vitamin D, farmed salmon is higher in carcinogens such as PCBs, brominated flame retardants, antibiotics, and pesticides such as dioxin and DDT.
To boost milk production, cattle are often treated with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH or rBST), said Rick North, project director of the Campaign for Safe Food at the Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility. These growth hormones induce the production of another hormone called insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) in milk. High IGF-1 levels in humans have shown to increase the risk of breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer.
Unfermented GMO soy
According to biotech specialist Michael Harris, non-GMO fermented soy is the only soy fit for human consumption. Genetically modified, unfermented soy has been found to disrupt hormonal balance and may cause several types of cancer too.
“An apple a day keeps the doctor away” is a common phrase that may no longer be true. Mark Kastel, co-director of the Cornucopia Institute (a farm-policy research group that supports organic foods), said that from all conventionally grown fruits, apples are the most doused in pesticides. While the industry claims these chemicals to be safe for humans, Marks added that farm workers have higher rates of many types of cancer.
Should parents have the right to exercise conscientious objection in order to prevent their children from being inoculated with vaccines produced from aborted fetal cell lines? And what does science tell us about these vaccines?
Scientists, ecclesiastics, activists and parents will gather at a Rome conference on March 13 to explore the history, science and politics surrounding the use of aborted fetuses in vaccines given to children around the world.
The association organizing the event is called Renovatio 21. The conference will take place at 3:30pm at the Casa Bonus Pastor in Rome and will be themed: “Faith, Science and Conscience: using aborted fetuses for pharmaceutical production.”
LifeSite spoke with one of the founders of Renovatio 21, Cristiano Lugli, ahead of the event.
He pointed out that the use of aborted fetuses in vaccine research has been confirmed by one of its own great pioneers, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a doctor and consultant of Sanofi-Pasteur.
In a shocking courtroom interrogation in July 2018, Plotkin said that 76 aborted fetuses were used in one study alone. During the interrogation, Plotkin, a self-professed atheist who admitted to “taking issue with religious beliefs,” also said he would be “glad” to go to hell for having use “aborted tissues” in vaccines.
Lugli, a father, said the aim of the Rome conference is to inform parents and Catholic institutions concerning the history and science behind this practice, and to “battle against the obligation to inoculate our children with vaccines produced from cell lines of aborted fetuses.”
Also to be discussed at the conference is the Pontifical Academy for Life’s recent and disturbing shift in support of such vaccines on the grounds that “in the past vaccines may have been prepared from cells from aborted human fetuses,” but today “the cell lines used are very distant from the original abortions.”
The list of conference speakers includes Dr. Theresa Deisher, research scientist and director of the Sound of Choice Pharmaceutical Institute; and Dr. Debi Vinnedge, President of the “Children of God for Life,” the world leader in the campaign for ethical vaccines, medicines and consumer products. Other noted speakers include Italian scientist Stefano Montanari, director of Nanodiagnostics Laboratory, and Dr. Martina Collotta, a medical doctor and expert in bioethics and biotechnologies.
US Cardinal Raymond Burke, former prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, will deliver the opening and concluding address at the March 13 event.
The conference has also received the endorsement of Bishop Athanasius Schneider, who in a letter to conference organizers called the use of aborted fetuses in vaccine research a “new barbarity of biological cannibalism.”
Here is our interview with conference organizer Cristiano Lugli.
LifeSite: Cristiano, what can you tell us about Renovatio 21?
Lugli: Renovatio 21 was founded about two years ago. I am one of the two founders, along with author Roberto Dal Bosco, who had the initial inspiration.
Our aim is to defend the unrepeatable and divine miracle of Life, and to defend Civilization as the earthly cradle of Life. The abyss that has opened up under humanity threatening to swallow it is so great that we no longer believe it is only necessary to “defend”: For the sake of life and civilization, we need to go on the attack.
Unborn life, end of life, artificial fertilization, moral subversion, vaccinations and mass psycho-pharmaceuticals: The Culture of Death is spreading everywhere. The culture of death perverts the pure, kills the innocent, exterminates man and his children. This is happening now. We have taken up the mission of defending the last bank of moral and bioethical resistance with the strength and resources we have.
What inspired you to sponsor the upcoming conference in Rome?
This conference was inspired by one of the main purposes for which Renovatio 21 was founded: to do battle against the obligation to inoculate our children with vaccines produced from cell lines of aborted fetuses. The issue is very important, both for moral and scientific reasons. In 2005, during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II, the Pontifical Academy for Life was quite clear on the issue and published a document that reiterated the obligation in conscience to fight against the production of these morally illicit vaccines.
But things today have changed somewhat. In July 2017, the Pontifical Academy for Life issued a brief note — on the same day the Italian government approved a law mandating compulsory vaccines for children — saying there are no longer moral problems with the vaccines in question, as if the problem no longer exists. In fact, the statement said that, if “in the past vaccines may have been prepared from cells from aborted human fetuses,” today “the cell lines used are very distant from the original abortions.” The statement from the Pontifical Academy for Life added that “the cell lines on which the vaccines in question are cultivated come only from the two fetuses originally aborted in the 1960s.” These claims are not supported by the science and will be among the topics to be discussed at the Rome conference.
We have therefore decided to organize this event to help people to understand that the problems, from 2005 to the present, have remained the same, if not worsened.
How long have vaccines been produced using the cell lines of aborted fetuses?
Consider that the two main abortions to produce the two cell lines most used in vaccines (MRC-5 and WI-38) date back to the 1960s. For more than sixty years, therefore, many vaccines have been produced in this way. Some say that since there are “only” two abortions and they are very old, the problem of cooperation with evil is so remote that the problem no longer exists. From a moral point of view, this is false, because the sin of abortion, which cries out to God for vengeance, cannot fall under a statute of limitations.
What is more, we know that many more abortions were carried out. This was confirmed by one of the greatest pioneers in vaccinations: Dr. Stanley Plotkin, doctor and consultant of Sanofi-Pasteur, in a shocking court interrogation in July 2018 stated that 76 aborted fetuses were used in just one pharmaceutical research study on vaccines. During the interrogation, Plotkin, a self-professed atheist who admitted to “taking issue with religious beliefs,” said he would be “glad” to go to hell for having use “aborted tissues” in vaccines.
How do companies who produce these vaccines justify their use of cell lines from aborted fetuses?
Pharmaceutical companies justify this “new barbarity of biological cannibalism” — as Bishop Athanasius Schneider rightly called it in a March 13 statement blessing our meeting — by saying that only “a few” fetuses were used to carry out scientific research for global health. We know that this reasoning is morally unacceptable: the sacredness of human life cannot be put in second place to the advancement of science.
Readers should also be aware that, in order to produce “good” cell lines, it’s necessary that the fetuses are very healthy and are taken alive, with the organs intact.
Who is profiting monetarily from the use of cell lines of aborted fetuses?
This human tissue market profits not only the pharmaceutical industry, but also (and first and foremost) abortion giants like Planned Parenthood. After the scandal that struck the for-profit abortion industry, the economic interests these companies have in selling organs of aborted fetuses to research centers is even more obvious.
Are there laws which obligate these companies to tell parents that their child is being injected with a vaccine containing cell lines of aborted fetuses?
Basically pharmaceutical companies are obliged by law to indicate that there are cell lines of aborted fetuses in some vaccines — such as the one that is mandatory in Italy, MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live). Even though they are obliged by law to write it on the packaging, they still try to deny it. It’s absurd.
They are not obliged to let people know that new cell lines (using aborted fetuses) have been created, such as Walvax-2, yet they publish studies on these new vaccines because they are shameless. These new cell lines will replace the old ones, which likely have become severely carcinogenic, as Dr. Theresa Deisher, a researcher speaking at the conference, will explain.
Is this an international problem?
The problem is certainly international, because vaccines are becoming mandatory everywhere, and are produced by the same pharmaceutical companies in every state. In Italy there is currently no possibility of conscientious objection on religious grounds. In almost all 50 US states such legislation exists, but there are efforts underway to remove this protection.
We are fighting to ensure that parents who are believers can take advantage of conscientious objection, because cooperation to evil, even if indirect and remote, is still a problem of conscience.
Who are the featured speakers at the conference?
We have a number of special guests who will be speaking at the conference. His Eminence Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, who has decided to support our battle, will deliver an opening and closing address. Debi Vinnedge, President of “Children of God For Life” — an American association fighting to stop the production of vaccines and cosmetics made with aborted human tissue — will also speak.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, a researcher and director of Sound of Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, will focus on the pioneering research she and her team are engaged in.
This will be followed by Dr. Martina Collotta, an Italian medical expert in bioethics. Dr. Collotta will highlight the horrible procedures for extracting live and intact aborted fetuses.
Prof. Stefano Montanari, an Italian scientist who has conducted several microscopic analyses on vaccines, finding several anomalies, will also address the conference. Prof. Montanari has long supported our fight and is the only researcher in Italy to do so.
What are your hopes for the conference?
Our hope and our goal is to awaken consciences and to send a clear and strong message also to Catholic institutions. We hope they will be listening. But the message is also addressed to the large Italian Pro-Life associations: bringing to Italy the work of a large American association such as “Children of God for Life,” which is fighting for this cause, is aimed at making it clear to the Italian pro-life movement that fighting abortion also means stopping this scientific and pharmaceutical commodification.
In Italy, a doctor can, in certain cases, refuse to give an electrocardiogram to a woman who is going to have an abortion. Is it possible that parents cannot refuse to inoculate their child with a vaccine obtained and produced through a gravely illicit act such as abortion?