Category Archives: New Zealand Massacre

Video: Was the NZ Shooter Really Far Right?

The motive behind the tragic shooting in New Zealand has been associated with conservative ideologies. Trevor Loudon discusses with Christian Gomez that the motives were in fact far from it. Loudon dives into the shooter’s manifesto, which aligns with National Bolshevism, and even borrows it’s imagery. Open the Video

Please follow and like us:

Video-Forensics: The “forbidden” Christchurch video 24 discrepancies that thrill “hoaxers”

The official offender
Brenton Tarrant. This unemployed man has travelled exciting crisis areas halfway around the world in recent years, allegedly radicalizing himself to the far right. Whether this happened in North Korea or in the Balkans, in Israel, in Turkey, in Iran, in Afghanistan or China’s civil war region Xinjiang is not explained. In Pakistan, where the alleged racist and Islam-hater also stayed near the embattled Kashmir area.

only 5 months before the gunshots of Christchurch, he seems to have felt totally at ease. In a Facebook post he praises the inhabitants and indirectly also the government of the Muslim country.

That is the vita, the official vita, which seemed “complete” until a few weeks ago.

By now we know that Tarrant was a member of the right-wing Knights Templar Order, which, among others, has the goal to “infiltrate Islamist groups to report their terrorist plans to the authorities”

How is it that one thinks of intelligence work looking at this vita?

Radicalization in front of everyone’s eyes

Now there are rules with most secret services: the employees are meant to investigate, and may behave appropriate to the investigated milieu. “Heil Hitler” and Nazi gestures (not yet reported by Tarrant) are allowed, expressing extremist views, as well. The execution of terrorist attacks, however, does not belong in the work spectrum. But right here Tarrant seems to have “ended up”. Apparently he recently attracted attention with wild propaganda on the Internet – and should then have resorted to arms. This last stage of life must not be fact based, it could also be ascribed to him, by others.

Anyone who deals in detail with intelligence services, will find a very popular “trick” to manifest a desired political narrative on the one hand and to prevent, on the other hand, clarifications by police and media: the planting of enemy agents or liaisons in dirty events.

Various terror incidents raise the suspicion of such a method:

Berlin, Christmass market attack, 2016: Documents from suspected german “Verfassungsschutz”-agent Anis Amri were found in the driver cabin; he was shot before he could testify about his previous life.
Munich, killing spree, 2016: Shortly before the attack Daoud Sonboly, who, as media reported, voluntarily trained on the weapon in Iran, or someone else under his name, bought weapons on the internet. Sonboly was shot.
Germany, NSU-case: Uwe Mundlos and Uwe Böhnhardt who in 1998 went underground with the help of German secret services who also supported them financially whilst in hiding, were, in 2011, found shot dead after authorities were seeking culprits in a series of murders within the drug/weapons/money laundering scene. As their last act they supposedly sent videos of confession.
Kennedy murder: Alleged killer Lee Harvey Oswald, who spent a lot of time in the CIA environment, was shot. Afterwards, a photograph appeared showing the sniper with his murder weapon in his proud arm. It is fake.

Each of these men pertinently documented his dangerous intentions. Or got them documented. Tarrant fits in. Supposedly he has been arrested. The pictures showing “him” in court are pixelated.

The training

If you want to compare Brenton Tarrant with a terrorist ‘predecessor’ then Anders Behring Breivik is most obvious. In his “manifest” Tarrant refers to the Swede, who is said to have bombed half of Oslo’s government district into rubble and then slaughtered several dozen members of a youth camp.

Tarrant, like Breivik, visited a radical Templar order. Pictures of Tarrant – like those of Breivik – are for the most part edited. And his “massacre of Christchurch” ran completely parallel to an anti-terrorist police training, same place, same day – as it was the case with Breivik’s bloody special mission.

As luck would have it, this interaction too is a specialty evil tongues associate with intelligence services: to counteract anti-terrorist exercises by infiltrating own agents as perpetrators into foreign training, to then leave the responsibility or at least the bad after taste to the authorities of the “host” country.

Some examples:

Norway, July 22, 2011: The terrorist attacks attributed to Breivik were a direct continuation of an official terrorist exercise with almost identical content compared to what happened in reality. Over the previous four days, and on this fateful Friday, the Norwegian anti-terrorist forces trained how to deal with a “mobile” terrorist attack, in which “one or more terrorists target to kill as many civilians as possible and attack the police upon their arrival”. The exercise was completed at 3 pm. At 3:26 pm the bomb exploded in Oslo’s government district. Paris, November 13, 2015: The terrorist acts, i.a. against Bataclan nightclub, were coordinated attacks in five different locations in Paris’ 10th and 11th arrondissement as well as in three locations in the suburb of Saint-Denis. On this very day, medical emergency services, police and fire departments in Paris trained responses to attacks by an “armed group in several parts of the city”. On September 11, 2001, US Air Defense was “otherwise employed”. In Canada, the “Global Guardian” exercise addressed military response to hijacked civilian aircrafts. And in the US, the “Vigilant Guardian” trained via computer-simulation the reaction to hijacked civilian aircrafts and as well testing readiness in case the World Trade Center was hit by those planes. Osama bin Laden, who is regarded as the brain of the real-time incident, has been in close contact with the CIA since the late 1970s until months before the attacks.  

The July 7, 2005 bombings of London’s public transport: Ex-Scotland Yard anti-terrorist expert Peter Power, later director of one of Britain’s largest crisis-training groups, held an exercise during the very hour of the real bomb attacks. Training topic was the emergency response to bombings in exactly the same underground stations, where they exploded in reality. The later identified – and disappeared – “perpetrators” all had connections to British intelligence. Whether they were at all present at the crime scene remains unproven, since the only published pictures showing them together on that day (at a subway station) were computer-edited.

As already mentioned, a reality-based anti-terrorism exercise also took place in Christchurch on the very day of the drama, topic: how to deal with armed offenders.

Members of these training forces, not ordinary police, secured, possibly according to the training script, “explosives” in several cars, including the vehicle of the mosque shooter.

Commissioner Bush, 3 hours after the attacks:”several IEDs attached to cars have been made safe now.” “This speaks to the seriousness of what occurred.”

And it was them who arrested Tarrant. There is a video showing the “arrest”. The professional action – the car was rammed – may indicate that the “arrest” was part of the ongoing training.

Considering Tarrants vita, which suggests anti-terrorist activities, the headline could read: How special forces correctly retire a colleague. In fact, the New Zealand Herald reports that Australian snipers participated in this or an accompanying exercise and were also seen near the crime scenes.

If Tarrant was part of it, that would explain how he managed to bring his weapons into the country. But how did he get out of control? Or: Did he at all? All that is still in the dark. The police authorities withhold information. According to media reports, the arresting staff of the exercise forces are just beginning their annual leave and, of course, their names are kept secret. And: the pixelated face of the arrested shown in court raises the question of whether it even IS the Australian at all.

The appearance of the unknown – most of him is indeed unknown – is yet to come, allegedly he has renounced a defender.

For the time being safe answers for the interested audience can only be taken from the shooting video at Al Noor Mosque. However it’s hard to get hold of it. It is guarded like a state secret.

The suppression of the “evidence video”

Tarrant’s video, still to find HERE

(New Zealand Mosque Shooting Uncensored)

has been “classified by the Chief Censor’s Office as objectionable,” under a 1993 New Zealand law, which allows convictions up to 10 years of prison for downloading and/or distributing incriminating films. New Zealand Police have also been searching personal data of users who even controversially discuss Tarrant’s ‘manifesto’ or video.

These censorship measures took over the entire world network within hours and subsequently made it impossible for non-New Zealanders to form an opinion on the video.

Remarkably, such measures have NOT been applied to the much crueller ISIS videos, which show beheadings, drownings, and burns alive. The relevant “Charlie Hebdo videos” are still available on the internet.

Why this time is different, so say the Hoaxer, has its reason in numerous vulnerabilities of the Christchurch perpetrator’s video.

And they have more than a few arguments on their side.

What the video shows

The navigation -16.10 (0.43) Logic-Fail

The “shooter” who reportedly prepared for this crime for 2 years uses his car navigation on the way to Al Noor Mosque, but does not use it on his – more stressful – way to Linwood Mosque.

The „perpetrators“ selfie -13.46 (3.09) Tech-Fail

The driver intentionally swings the camera over to his face at one point, allowing to ‘recognize’ him. It’s the only ‘evidence picture’ because there is no surveillance camera footage of the attacked mosques. The mask-like face seen in the car video may well be that of today’s “offender” Brenton Tarrant. But it looks like it has been cut out and does not fit in with the body, or -the stills show it particularly clear – the body seems too far behind the head. Post production comes into mind.×403.jpg

The blind „eyewitnesses“ -10.28 (6.25) Basis-Video vs Endproduct

The “shooter” walks past two people in front of the gate of Al-Noor mosque. They are not surprised by the helmeted, camouflaged and armed passerby, who in turn ignores both “witnesses”

7b To counter the impression, that the guns might have been “invisible”, when the film was made, we have an eyewitness. The msn-article reads as followed: Mohamed Yama was praying in the Al Noor mosque having the closest of escapes after bravely confronting the gunman. “I am shocked,” he said.

“I say hey. What are you doing? What’s the gun? This is a mosque.”

Mr Yama then recounts the moment the gunman turned to him and fired miraculously missing him by the slimmest of margins.

As worshippers tried to escape, Mohamed fled onto the street calling ambulances.

BUT: We don´t find this “occurence” on “tarrant´s film” – it is neither to be seen nor to be heard there.

HERE (0:37) we see and hear a second Mohamed Yama, another man under the same name who recounts the same incident. Watch “Tarrant´s film”, when he passes the cars, that this man is talking about. There is no voice to be heard by someone speaking to him in this area. And there is not the slightest reaction by the film-maker, that he might had been touched from behind. Besides the man recounts a false position of the film-camera. He points to his upper breast, instead of the head.

The aggressor greeted like a friend -10.19 (6.36) Basic vs Finished Product

This obvious discrepancy continues at the entrance gate to the mosque, where the “perpetrator” points his gun at people standing at the door while these first “victims” greet him with the words “hello brother” which is common among Muslims.

No weapon recoil -10.18 (6.37ff) Tech-Logic-Fail

The “shooting” starts at the mosque gate. The tremble-free video does not show any weapon recoil which gives rise to the assumption that the filming person was unarmed. For comparison, see 3.00

52 shots from a 30 shots magazine -10.11 (6.44ff) Tech-Logic-Fail

After the entry scenario (9 shots) the “shooter” drops the weapon and changes to his second rifle. Here the shot sequence: Creeping: 3 shots; side room: 4 shots; forward in the hallway: 4 shots; entrance to the prayer room (crawling and second body): 9 shots; on group right in the room: approx. 24 shots; on approaching person: 5 shots plus 3 on the ground. That makes – with a 30 shots magazine! – about 52 shots without apparent magazine change.

Why is no one escaping? -9.59 (6.57) Logic-Fail

When the shooter first enters the prayer room, he spares the group already crammed into the left corner. At -9.49 (7.06) he is back in the corridor, where he reloads –9.41 (7.14) and then goes back to the prayer room and only now, -9.36 (7.19) shoots at the body pile on the left. They had until then been able to escape to the garden through a glass door just two steps away, but with one exception – -9.36 (7.19) no one did.

No room damage Tech-Logic-Fail

In the same scene the “perpetrator” fires with high salvo density especially at the right side of the room. It is completely inexplicable why the walls and windows show no ammunition effects.

Barefoot “victim” in socks -8.13 (8.42) Different takes within filmmaking

A „victim“, which at the beginning crawls barefoot on the hallway’s floor, -10,06(6.47) wears blue socks in a later camera shot.

Water without rain -7.58 (8.55) Different takes within filmmaking

The “shooter” leaves the mosque and takes to the streets. At the entrance to the mosque there is a large water mark, which according to the video time code two and a half minutes before -10.27 (6.27) was still considerably smaller or narrower. In the short meantime – a cone locking the exit underlines this – no cars can have come out. This is an indication a prolonged stage setting, disguised by a hidden camera cut.

Senseless shooting & cool vehicles -7.58 (8.57ff) Basic vs Finished Product

If the scenic routes “sidewalk/street/side road” were pre-recorded like all tracking shots in the open air, then there was some action required to put on top the pre-recorded material. The senseless shooting on the streets when no one was around, appear suitable for such a use. Strikingly, the car traffic on the road continues undisturbed!

Dissolving cartridges -7.58 (8.57ff) Tech-Logic-Fail

The phenomenon of the “phantom cartridges”, which has already been mentioned in 15, is particularly clearly confirmed when the shooter takes the street in front of the mosque under “fire”. Here you can see the ejection of the cartridge cases – which, however, a thing of impossibility, DISSOLVE in the air! The few cartridges that seem to reach the ground without the typical clanking noise magically disappear within seconds.

No consequences for cars -7.04 (9.52ff) Basic vs Finished Product

While the “shooter” passes the entrance area of the mosque on the road, we notice in the right angle that a silver van parked in front of the gate is moving in the yard. However, the “perpetrator” ignores the car and rather shoots in the empty side road. As he walks back down the alley to the mosque, the van is already gone. There is only one (!) scene in which “shots” are aimed at a car: This is the front window shot at -3.58 (12.50) where the “shooter”, despite three attempts, hits nothing.

Music contradicts livestream -6.55 (10.01ff) Post production

In the video you can almost continuously hear music, regardless of whether the ‘offender’ in the car, outdoors or in the mosque. This would only make sense if he had a portable music device with him. If he had, then still the question arises, why the temporal settings of the shots is not backed by music. This can actually only be explained by post-production. An additional indication is the ‘suitable’ mood influencing use of music after the head shot at an ‘escaping woman’ -4.45 (12.13). The background music changes to the song “I am the God of Hellfire” then.

Additionally it should be noticed, that the reloading of the weapon(s) always sound the same, so as if someone used one and the same sound-effect on multiple occasions.

The mumbling and tipping over Tech-Fail

The background acoustics from the “victims” are striking as well: throughout the massacre we only hear some sort of a continuous murmur. Individual screams of pain, shouts, or warning calls are nowhere to be heard. Almost all “victims” are already motionless on the ground when the camera hits them first time, without any visual effect of being hit or of suffering, sometimes -9.59 (6.56) even related shot on (seemingly) targeted people are questionable.

Dolls and Photoshop? -6.00 (10.55) Basic vs Finished Product

There is too little blood caused by the massacre. This is 100% correct for the first run; what would explain – in case of a virtual manipulation of the film – why the “perpetrator” had to leave the mosque and “return” to document at least “standing” blood near the entrance and in two or three places of the prayer room. The hoax community therefore suspects fake victims. The analysis of one scene out of this community judges by a ‘victim’s’ arm movement that the bodies were not on-site as a group at the time of filming but are individually extracted from other picture and film footage and merged into a group per mouse click. However, this arm movement is less compelling than the leg posture of the jeans wearing ‘victim’ lying next to it. His legs (a short-term illumination underlines it) seem to FLOAT.

Another example for unnatural body positions is the man “shot dead” at the main room’s entrance, -7.20/8.13 lying face down but legs somehow bent in the air, looking rather like a doll than a human being.

Shoes taken off -5.08 (11.47ff) Logic-Fail

Finally leaving the mosque the “shooter” at the entrance targets two “refugees” escaping through a side gate in the property wall. To hit them is actually impossible because of the distance, the moving target and the very narrow shooting angle. But he seems to make it with two shots. The camera moves to the “victim” on the sidewalk, passes the (again?) closed gate and captures one meter next to the “victim”, for whatever reason, her shoes. The “assassin” “shoots” her in the head, blowing her hair to the side like under the effects of a hairdryer. The mortally hit woman’s hand reaches for her head. Meanwhile the car traffic moves calmly. The second person, who escaped, has not been presented by the media yet.

No bumpers whilst run over -4.29 (12.26ff) Basic vs Finished Product

Leaving the crime scene the “perpetrator” drives over that woman’s body. The noticeable “bumpers” in the car are far too small to have come from overrunning a human body.

Silence on chaos day -4.27 (12.28ff) Basic vs Finished Product

Although the police was alerted already 2 minutes after the first shots at Al Noor mosque and 20 ambulances were on their way there, you can only hear one siren during the “shooters” drive away from Al Noor mosque to Linwood mosque.

The unbreakable front window -3.58 (12.50ff) Tech-Logic-Fail

The “offender” fires his weapon from in (!) the car through his front window without causing any visible destruction. The video footage of his arrest as well shows no damage to the front window.

In reality, the blast – multiplied in a closed and even more so in a small space – is enormous with live ammunition. The “shooter” should have been “deaf” first and the microphone should have had to override at this point. This means that the recording device could not have processed more sounds in the same line, but in this case it surprisingly can. –


The fact is that those who point out the possibility of a faked attack have a number of points in their favor:

52 shots from a 30-shots magazine
Self dissolving cartridge
Missing ammunition effects on walls and car windows
Barefoot victim with socks

All these are real killer arguments against the credibility of the video and thus against the official narrative.

Furthermore there is clear evidence that the video was “produced” and processed in two rounds, and this before the crime. The first round being a pure video recording of only the car drive and the mosque. In the second round, the hoax-community says, the shocking action scenes were subsequently layered on top of the plain drive-location video, partly with the help of bluebox / green screen effects and Photoshop, possibly even with the use of dolls and so-called crisis actors, the latter typical for training scenarios.

The question is: who then was the political director? The mosques operators and the New Zealand government, together with the subordinate investigating police would be the first to suspect, because they ‘behaved’ according to the – supposedly fictional – narrative. But the reason for them to make such a dubious evidence video remains puzzling. It may have been a pure training movie, designed for internal drill use, on this day. But New Zealand may have pursued further external intentions with the film.

Anyway there is the suspicion that this very product was seized by third parties and modified in a way that literally produced their own movie and put New Zealand’s government under pressure. We probably will never know the whole truth.

Please follow and like us:

Video: Christchurch – How They Did It

There are still many markers I did not include in this dialogue, but I have only been getting around 4 hours sleep per night since this event happened and was very tired when I recorded this broadcast. Thus I either forgot to mention them, or had not yet noticed them.

However if everyone can get away from the fake/real debate with the Christchurch Shooters video, not want to believe either side, and really look, at what is happening in your peripheral vision with this video, this shooting in NZ has MK Ultra and Tavistock written all over it. it may sound weird but, look at his car – color markers, turquoise compliance label in that car… they come in all colors but why was his turquoise (right eye)? then the yellow air freshener (left eye) – He is switched on. He drives out, then, red car – red car, click, click – he’s primed – on standby… then, all at once, a trailer with a red flag + yellow building on the right + yellow car on the left (same bright yellow – what are the chances?) + yellow air freshener + turquoise label. The color combo. Click. He’s switched on. Go! Turns on music – the program is running

This shooter was programmed to react to colors and sounds. Look at the drive there. And I would even be willing to bet that he thought he was just going to a training exercise as part of the drill that was running in Christchurch, and he was recording it to show off to his mates on 4 chan. How the fuck did he know he had been programmed?

And Im certain his handlers had no idea he intended to stream the drill to his mates. People don’t realize what this video is showing them. This was a Tavistock MK ultra hit with real bullets, real victims and a mind controlled patsy – and for the first time ever. We have the patsy’s view of it.

And I’m not saying that – the video is saying that…. And for the first time ever. We can see the triggers and see exactly how they do it. The victims would have likely been brought there to be killed, that’s why there were no shoes. The controllers were likely getting them into the corners, but they were killed too – no loose ends…

The video shows a very real possibility that this guy thought he was simply on a training exercise in one of the drills, and he probably streamed it live to show off to his mates. Remember in the car, he was saying how “I couldn’t top my time because I had no ease of access, but if you have ease of access, you will top you time”. If we factor the possibility that he was chatting away to his mates so calmly happily that way after just slaughtering 41 people because he thought he had just run them through the training drill with him, his dialogue even starts to make sense. Open the Video

Please follow and like us:

How we know New Zealand mosque shooting video is a CGI Fake

On March 14, 2019, New Zealand sustained its deadliest mass shootings in modern history when a lone gunman, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant, killed 50 people and injured another 50 at Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand. The media immediately identified Tarrant as that most noxious of all monsters — “an alt-right affiliated white supremacist”. (Wikipedia)

The gunman recorded and streamed on Facebook Live a video of the first attack at Al Noor Mosque, with 4,000 overall views before it was taken down. The video is banned by the New Zealand government because it is deemed “objectionable” — whatever that means. Anyone who possesses or shares the video is threatened with 10-14 years in prison; corporations (such as web hosts) face an additional $200,000 ($137,000 US) fine under the same law

Even without being asked by the New Zealand government, mainstream U.S.-owned platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Scribd eagerly complied with the ban by scrubbing the video and the shooter’s manifesto. YouTube went so far as to intentionally disable search filters so that people cannot find the video or other Christchurch shooting materials.

Websites such as Dissenter, Zero Hedge, 4chan, 8chan, and video hosting platform LiveLeak, among others, which hosted footage of the attacks or simply allowed people to engage in uncensored discussion of the shootings, have been partially or completely blocked in both New Zealand and Australia for the sake of “protecting consumers,” according to New Zealand Telecom, the privately-owned telecommunications provider.

In an open letter to Facebook, Twitter and Google, New Zealand telecom CEOs said the suppression hasn’t gone far enough, and urged that U.S. social media follow European proposals for hyper-vigilant policing of content for the sake of “protecting consumers”. The letter reads (Zero Hedge):

“You may be aware that on the afternoon of Friday 15 March, three of New Zealand’s largest broadband providers, Vodafone NZ, Spark and 2degrees, took the unprecedented step to jointly identify and suspend access to web sites that were hosting video footage taken by the gunman related to the horrific terrorism incident in Christchurch.

As key industry players, we believed this extraordinary step was the right thing to do in such extreme and tragic circumstances. Other New Zealand broadband providers have also taken steps to restrict availability of this content….

We also accept it is impossible as internet service providers to prevent completely access to this material. But hopefully we have made it more difficult for this content to be viewed and shared – reducing the risk our customers may inadvertently be exposed to it and limiting the publicity the gunman was clearly seeking.”

In our time of movies, TV and video games saturated with over-the-top violence, why would the New Zealand government take such extreme measures to prevent its citizens from seeing the video?

The answer perhaps is that if the people of New Zealand actually saw the video, they would realize the mosque shootings were a gigantic false-flag hoax perpetrated on them in order to advance gun control. (The video can still be viewed on BitChute, the file-sharing video hosting service, and also here.)

Two FOTM posts have addressed the mosque shooter’s video: “The Christchurch mosque-shooting video banned by New Zealand government” and “The NZ mosque-shooting post that got Tony Mead banned from Facebook, again“.

This post offers four reasons why we can confidently say the mosque shooting video is a CGI (computer generated imagery) fake, using the chroma key compositing (or “green screen”) technique:
(1) When shot, people don’t just fall like inert sacks of potatoes

In an audio interview and on James Fetzer’s blog, Dr. Scott Bennett, former U.S. Army psychological operations officer and State Department counterterrorism contractor, points out that in a real shooting with real bullets, especially when civilians are shot, they would be in a state of hysterical, emotional shock. Panic-stricken, their bodies flooded with adrenalin, they would violently flail, run or crawl away. They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like sacks of potatoes.

In the mosque shooter’s live-streamed video, however, the victims immediately fall to the floor like sacks of potatoes, face down (since faces are more of a CGI challenge). Once fallen to the floor, the victims stay still, with nary a moan nor twitch.

It stretches our credulity to think that the mosque shooter is such an expert marksman that every shot he fired was a kill shot. The fact is that in real life, bullets can bounce, ricochet, and miss the target.

Writing in “What really happens when you get shot,” Wired, Dec. 8, 2015, Connor Narciso, a former Army Green Beret who served in Wardak Province, Afghanistan, with 3rd Special Forces Group, explains:

As a combat medic in Afghanistan, I treated a variety of gunshot wounds. And as the husband of an emergency room provider at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, gun violence has remained—at least peripherally—a significant part of my life….

[E]ven multiple gunshots to the torso won’t guarantee death, or even incapacitation. Arun Nair is an attending physician in the ER at Johns Hopkins, and an International Health Fellow. “Bullets are magic,” Nair tells his students. He recounts the story of a young man in Lebanon who survived after being shot six times.1 He took repeated shots to the chest and throat. One of the six bullets stopped inside his pericardium, the narrow space between the heart and its thin protective membrane. Another bullet ended up in the victim’s esophagus; he swallowed it. Amazingly, the patient was alert and speaking lucidly to the doctors. You can’t assume anything, says Nair.

(2) Shell Casings don’t vanish into thin air

At the 8:56 mark in the video, the gunman is outside the mosque’s front gate and begins shooting down the street. At the 9:06 mark, the gunman turns around and shoots down the street in the other direction.

Curiously, the video shows shell casings being ejected from the semi-automatic, but the casings then disappear into thin air. No shell casings are on the ground because this footage was actually taken not on the street but before a “green screen”, which explains why we see shell casings being ejected but no casing actually falls to the ground.

Link to the real Video of above gif

(3) bullets leave no marks when they hit the victims

After shooting up and down the street, ejecting shell casings that vanish into thin air, the gunman returns to his car and exchanges rifles, tossing the one he had used to the ground next to his car, which later also vanishes. He then inexplicably returns to the “crime scene” to shoot again and again at the crumpled bodies in the mosque. Strangely, the “bullets” leave no marks on the victims’ clothes or bodies. Upon impact, we see only a puff of air on the victim’s clothes, which suggests the gun was a toy gun that blasts air instead of solid projectiles.

Yesterday, in an email to James Fetzer, Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today who is, like Fetzer, a U.S. Marines veteran, wrote:

“I generally recognize any part or accessory available worldwide for this type of weapon the common sellers, palmetto state armory, delta team tactical, classic firearms…and nobody has part for real guns that look like the things in the video. mike and i have built thousands of custom AR weapons in every size and caliber this stuff is crap…..and quite possibly toys….What we have in NZ appears to be (real or fake) video of fake guns.”

Indeed, in a comment, Kevin J. Lankford, a reader of FOTM, observed that the shooter’s guns “looked like nothing I could identify,” and that the reason why the guns are painted with white symbols all over is precisely “to disguise the fact they are fake.”

(4) Bullets fired at windshield leave no holes or shattered glass

After the gunman finally leaves the mosque, he gets back into his car. While driving away, he shoots at the car’s windshield three times. Strangely, the bullets leave no marks on the windshield — no bullet holes, no smashed glass — as you can see in the GIF below and the pic of his arrest by police.

To conclude, the shooter’s livestream video was made with a live man shooting guns, at least one of which is a toy air gun, against a “green screen”. The “green screen” is then filled in with CGI images of the mosque and victims being shot; of the street outside the mosque where the gunman fired shots, ejecting shell casings that vanished into thin air; and of his car, wherein the gunman shot at the car’s windshield, leaving no bullet holes or shattered glass.

All in all, the video was poorly and sloppily made. Wellington should have hired Sir Peter Jackson’s Weta Workshop to do the job.

Go here to watch a video demonstrating the fakery of the mosque shooter’s livestream video by juxtaposing it with footage from a video game.

H/t Vivian Lee, Harold Saive, and Big Lug.

Please follow and like us:

New Zealand mass shooting now being used to justify banning all chat boards, consolidating speech in the hands of the “authoritative” media giants

In the wake of the revelation that the mass shooting that took place at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand may have actually been a contrived act of terrorism committed by an attention-seeking nihilist intentionally trying to “troll” the public, some on the Left are now calling for chat boards like 4chan to be completely shut down as the solution to what they perceive as the “problem” of online free speech.

A man named Thomas Wictor recently posted a video positing his theory that the deranged killer in this latest mass shooting incident isn’t actually a racist, nor is he anti-Muslim. Instead, Wictor contends that, based on the information contained in the guy’s published manifesto that many mainstream news outlets are now trying to censor, he was merely seeking the attention and approval of his friends.

“People need to understand what this was,” Wictor explains.

“This was not an act by a ‘white supremacist.’ This was not an act of someone who is anti-immigrant. If you read the manifesto, you see that this was history’s first ‘trolling’ mass murder. He was not angry. He was motivated entirely by nihilism. He has no values whatsoever. The manifesto shows it absolutely clearly.”

If Wictor’s observations are accurate, then this would mean that Brenton Tarrant, the suspect in question, purposely wrote conflicting information in his manifesto as a form of mockery against the mainstream media. It would also suggest that his primary goal wasn’t actually to commit mass murder per se, but simply to get a laugh for pulling off this horrific stunt.

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.

“He sees this act as a joke,” Wictor says about the killer. “In the manifesto, he makes several statements that are designed to mock any attempt to make sense of what he did. And that’s the hallmark of the jokester nihilist.”

“The prime minister and the police chief are expressing their horror – this makes trolls laugh. They’re all laughing. The mass murderer walked into a mosque full of unarmed people, and stood in the middle of the room and just unloaded magazine after magazine into huddling people.”

Even The Atlantic wrote a story about how Tarrant’s manifesto was “meant to troll,” meaning it was never supposed to make sense, nor was it designed to give an accurate indication of any type of motive beyond simply giving a giant middle finger to whomever he was trying to troll.

“He had no situational awareness,” Wictor says. “He said afterward that he was in a ‘firefight.’ A firefight is when people shoot back at you. Nobody was shooting at him. He dropped his weapon. He dropped his magazines. He was a buffoon.”

Whatever the case may be, Tarrant’s actions are already spurring Leftist jackboots into a frenzy over online free speech, including in New Zealand where the 4chan message board is now completely blocked from view. Internet users who attempt to access the site from a New Zealand-based IP address are greeted with the message:

“The URL has been blocked for security reasons.”

“As someone who has had to spend a lot of time on 4chan and 8chan tracking threats of violence, both websites should be shut down,” tweeted Ella Dawson, a senior social media editor for TED Talks.

“I don’t know how, just do it. Just get rid of them. They have no redeeming value. They are a breeding ground for hatred and violence.”

For more related news on the New Zealand mass shooting, be sure to check out

Sources for this article include:

Please follow and like us:

Strange Bedfellows: New Zealand Mass Murderer’s Primary Goals: Gun Control in the United States

The mass murderer in New Zealand was not an ordinary active shooter. He is a political terrorist who is working to advance a political agenda. One of his primary goals is to further gun control in the United States. His manifesto clearly states that goal. From The Great Replacement:

Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural,political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream.

The mass murderer studied the mass media, perhaps better than most political terrorists do. He saw their prejudices, their agendas, and structured his attack to use their weakness for his purposes. From his manifesto:

Why did you choose to use firearms?

I could have chosen any weapons or means. A TATP filled rental van. Household flour, a method of dispersion and an ignition source.A ballpeen hammer and a wooden shield.Gas,fire,vehicular attacks,plane attacks, any means were available. I had the will and I had the resources.I chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world.The US is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty.This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.

His study of the Media in the United States revealed to him the Media uses mass shootings to push for gun control in the United States, and elsewhere in the world. He wants the United States to balkanize. He re-emphasizes the point:

Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from Whites in the United States?

Yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time.

The mass murderer has little in common with Second Amendment supporters. He wants state control of the economy, partly for purposes of ecology, much like current Progressives and Socialists in the United States and Europe. He insists on the identity politics of race, much like the Progressives in the United States. He wants to end the “melting pot” of the United States, much as the Progressives insist on maintaining separate ethnic and racial identities in the United States. Second Amendment supporters welcome all who support and defend the Constitution, regardless of race. He detests President Trump as a leader. He does not like President Trump’s policies. The only thing he likes about President Trump is that President Trump is white. From his manifesto:

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?

As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

His inspiration is the political terrorist who he has emulated, the Norwegian mass murderer who is in prison. Anders Brevik murdered 77 people, of which 69 were from a youth camp for the far left Norwegian political parties. Brevik wanted to stop the Muslim colonization of Europe. From the manifesto:

Were your beliefs influenced by any other attackers?

I have read the writings of Dylan Roof and many others, but only really took true inspiration from Knight Justiciar Breivik.

The mass murderer is clear that he is not a conservative. He is not a fan of limited government. He calls himself an eco-fascist and considers the political structure of Communist China as the closest political structure to his ideas. From the manifesto:

Were/are you a fascist?

Yes. For once, the person that will be called a fascist is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that. I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature. The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.

Sir Oswald Mosley was a prominent National Socialist in England before and during the Second World War. Modern “Communist” China is necessarily a National Socialist political system. The party running China makes the trains run on time. The Chinese Communists call their system Socialism with Chinese characteristics.

To modern Progressives, with their identity politics and commitment to state control, the murderer’s manifesto will appear confusing. The murderer calls for more state control of the economy and calls himself an eco-fascist. The National Socialists in Germany were lovers of nature. The murderer’s manifesto will be confusing because, while he operates from identity politics, his identity politics are the opposite of current Progressive’s identity politics. He sees white people as the oppressed, endangered minority in the world.

Muslim terrorists wish to spark an all-out war with non-Muslims. The terrorist in New Zealand has the same goal from the opposite perspective. He wants to inflame a defensive battle by non-Muslims against Muslims who are invading the west.

After the terrorist attack on 911, I wrote the Muslim attackers were not cowards. From their perspective, they were courageous and dedicated warriors. Cowards do not take over airliners and fly them into buildings on a suicide mission.
New Zealand Bloody Flag
Muslim terrorists wish to spark an all-out war with non-Muslims. The terrorist in New Zealand has the same goal from the opposite perspective. He wants to inflame a defensive war by non-Muslims against Muslims who are invading the west.

The more intelligent, committed, and coherent political terrorists are, the more dangerous they are. This attacker was/is more dangerous than most. He claims the attack was planned over two years, and was in retaliation for terror attacks by Muslims. As a more general note, he says his attack is in retaliation for 1300 years of Muslim aggression, conquest, and murder.

Here is a prediction, based on the murderer’s agenda. The firearms he used will be found to have been manufactured in the United States. That works to advance his goal of pushing the Democrats in the United States to enact strict infringements on the Second Amendment. [And we can be sure that they will take the bait.]

Please follow and like us:

New Zealand’s Prime Minister dons hijab, orders national broadcast of Islamic call to prayer

New Zealanders — men as well as women — are also being asked to wear the hijab this Friday. The shock and horror that Jacinda Ardern and other New Zealanders are feeling over the attack is understandable. The good intentions of these initiatives are obvious.

Unfortunately, however, it will henceforth be difficult, if not completely impossible, to discuss the jihad threat in New Zealand; anyone who does so will be accused of fueling the hatred that led to the Christchurch massacre. So it can reasonably be expected that in the coming years, New Zealand will be a hospitable place for jihadis and Sharia supremacists, and any resistance to their initiatives will be stigmatized into insignificance.

“NZ Prime Minister orders national broadcast of Muslim call to prayer this Friday,” Michael Smith News, March 21, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

On television.

On radio.

In the New Zealand Parliament and government buildings.

There’ll be no escaping Islam’s Adhan (Muslim call to prayer) this Friday, the Muslim sabbath.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has announced a two-minute silence will be observed on Friday to mark a week since the Christchurch mosque shootings.

Ms Ardern spoke at a press conference in Christchurch this afternoon when she made the announcement.

“I know from many there is a desire to show support to the Muslim community as they return to mosques, particularly on Friday.

“There is also a desire amongst New Zealanders to mark the week that has passed since the terrorist attack.

“To acknowledge this, there will be a two-minute silence on Friday. We will also broadcast nationally via TVNZ and RadioNZ the Call to Prayer.”…
Please follow and like us:

Troubling signs New Zealand shooting is being used to turn my country into Islamic State

I live in New Zealand. I’ve become alarmed at developments in my country since the shootings last Friday. What I see unfolding seems so disproportionate to the magnitude of the crime. It seems like I’ve woken up and all of a sudden live in an Islamic State.

Here are some highlights of what’s unfolding:

The thought police are out in full force and people are being scrutinized for "hate speech".  Green ribbons are being worn as a symbol against hate.
Mosques and many of the prayer rooms continue to be protected by armed police (police aren't usually armed in my country). 
Vigils are being held all over the place in solidarity with the victims. These seem to have morphed into what amounts to support for the Islamic religion. Catholic Bishop Dunn held one last Sunday afternoon in the Ponsonby church.  After prayers there, they processed over to the mosque, which is on the opposite side of the road and prayed and met there.   
Whitcoulls, one of our book stores, probably the oldest, has removed Jordan Peterson's book "12 Rules for Life" from its shelves because he was photographed with a member of the public wearing an anti-Islamic t-shirt while he was in New Zealand recently. Apparently, that's being construed as him having something to do with the madman's agenda. 
On Tuesday a Muslim prayer was said in Parliament. Just recently all Christian prayer in Parliament was removed. 
On Friday March 22 at 1:30pm New Zealand will be called to prayer...Islamic prayer that is.  And we will be expected to keep 2 minutes silence after they read the Muslim prayer acknowledging Allah as "great" and Muhammad as his "prophet." The call to prayer will be broadcasted on national radio stations and TV as well.   
Cardinal Dew will go to the local mosque (Kilbirnie) as well on Friday to stand outside during their prayers as an act of solidarity. The Catholic bishops here have been very sympathetic and playing out their "inter-faith role" with great enthusiasm. 
Catholic school students have been praying inside mosques. 

It seems like we’re living in a different world all of a sudden. It seems that showing our great respect for those who were killed has somehow been manipulated into showing affirmation of the Islamic religion.

New Zealand is now putty in the Islamists’ hands.

The shooting on Friday was terrible. But what has now unfolded is something else entirely and may just be the beginning of something very terrible for New Zealand.

Certainly, on a spiritual level, our crisis has become even deeper.

Please keep New Zealand in your prayers.

Please follow and like us: