Tag Archives: world

One of the Greatest Cover-ups in History, it’s Time the World Knew: Cancer and the Rothschilds

As many have suspected over the years, the Rothschilds control every market, including our medicine and foods.

Due to this, the Rothschilds have effectively removed from our diet the very foods that prevents cancer, by replacing good, healthy foods with their manufactured Frankenfoods.

Society needs to go back to organic and wholesome foods for better health and longevity.

If the Elite does not allow us to do so, then we must form a revolution.

What the rich are doing is a crime against Humanity and Life.

When will humanity revolt against the Elite?

The video below presents the stunning evidence of just how the Rothschilds have used Cancer to control our health.



Please follow and like us:

New World Order of the Knights of the Garter – the Last Leg of the March to Tyranny

 The Most Noble Order of the Garter
Heads Up for Monday, 18 June 2018 – Garter Day!

Extra Special this year perhaps as the Queen double-booked her calendar last year and the 2017 Order of the Garter cermony for the MOST PRESTIGIOUS British Order of Chivalry had to be cancelled?!


As Garter Day is nearly upon us I thought it may be worth asking you to look into the history and background of this most prestigious Order of Chivalry from a slightly different perspective.


Chapter 1 – The Enigma


French Maxim

‘Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense’ – ‘Shamed be [he] who evil of it thinks’.


What does ‘it’ refer to and why the ‘Garter’ reference?

Fig 1: Most Noble Order of the Garter – established 1348

Enigmatically, the motto is also associated with the following:

  • It is incorporated in the coat of arms of the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls in Rome[1]
  • It is on the coat of arms above the lower main gate of the castle of the German city of Tübingen.
  • It appears on the coat of arms of the Elector of Saxony in Stolpen, Germany (dated 1673).
  • It is on the coat of arms for Heidelberg Castle, Germany (dated 1683).
  • It appears in the source code for Apollo 11 [2]
  • It appears in the comments of the source code for the master ignition routine of the Apollo 13 lunar module [3]
  • It appears on American Tax Stamps circa 1765 [4]
  • Until 1997 it appeared prominently on Hong Kong banknotes
  • It appears in the staff used by the Usher of the Black Rod of the Parliament of Canada.
  • It appears on the Royal Coat of Arms of the British East India Company[5]
  • It appears on pre-revolution Cuban Cigar Bands
  • It appears on the front cover of the British Passport

Fig 2: Abbazia di San Paolo fuori le Mura (Abbey of St. Paul Outside the Walls, Rome)

Figures 3 & 4: Le Schloss Hohentübingen (near Stuttgart, Germany)

Fig 5: Coat of Arms of the Elector of Saxony in Stolpen, Germany – over the entrance to the Electoral Amtshaus [13]

Fig 6: Coat of Arms for Heidelberg Castle, Germany (dated 1683).

Fig 7: American Tax Stamp – circa 1765 [4]

The American Stamp Act was enacted on November 1, 1765 and repealed in March 1766.

Fig 9: Hong Kong Coinage – the Tael (1867)

Fig 10: Colonial Coat of Arms – British Hong Kong

Fig 11: Royal Coat of Arms of the British East India Company – Penang Museum, Malaysia [5]

Fig 12: Pre- Revolution Cuban Cigar Band

Fig 13: British Passport

Chapter 2 – The Origins of the Order

List of Founder Knights

At the time of its foundation, the Order consisted of King Edward III, together with 25 Founder Knights, listed in ascending order of stall number in St George’s Chapel:-

King Edward III (1312–77)

Edward, the Black Prince, Prince of Wales (1330–76)

Henry of Grosmont, Earl of Lancaster (c. 1310–61)

Thomas de Beauchamp, 11th Earl of Warwick (d. 1369)

Jean de Grailly, Captal de Buch (d. 1377)

Ralph de Stafford, 1st Earl of Stafford (1301–72)

William de Montacute, 2nd Earl of Salisbury (1328–97)

Roger Mortimer, 2nd Earl of March (1328–60)

John de Lisle, 2nd Baron Lisle (1318–56)

Bartholomew de Burghersh, 2nd Baron Burghersh (d. 1369)

John de Beauchamp, 1st Baron Beauchamp (d. 1360)

John de Mohun, 2nd Baron Mohun (c. 1320–76)

Sir Hugh de Courtenay (d. 1349)

Thomas Holland, 1st Earl of Kent (1314–1360)

John de Grey, 1st Baron Grey de Rotherfield (c. 1300–59)

Sir Richard Fitz-Simon (b. 1295)

Sir Miles Stapleton (d. 1364)

Sir Thomas Wale (d. 1352)

Sir Hugh Wrottesley (d. 1381)

Sir Nele Loring (d. 1386)

Sir John Chandos (d. 1369)

Sir James Audley (d. 1369)

Sir Otho Holand (d. 1359)

Sir Henry Eam (d. before 1360)

Sir Sanchet D’Abrichecourt (d. 1345)[3]

Sir Walter Paveley (d. 1375)


They are all depicted in individual portraits in the Bruges Garter Book made c. 1431, and now in the British Library.

Fig 14: Edward of Woodstock (1330-1376), the Black Prince of Wales, a Founder Member of the Knights of the Garter (William Bruges’s Garter Book c1430-40).

Note the Double Headed Eagle – a symbol of the Holy Roman Empire.

Edward of Woodstock was the first Duke of Cornwall (from 1337), the Prince of Wales (from 1343) and the Prince of Aquitaine (1362–72). In 1348 he was made a Founding Knight of the Garter. Born 15 June 1330 Woodstock Palace, Oxfordshire.

Chapter 3 – Other Notable Members

Fig 15: John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough atop the Column of Victory at Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxford dressed as a Roman General, eagles at his feet and a Winged Victory in his hand (monument completed 1730)

John Churchill (1650 – 1722), 1st Duke of Marlborough, 1st Prince of Mindelheim, 1st Count of Nellenburg, Prince of the Holy Roman Empire, Knight of the Order of the Garter, PC.

Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill, his descendant and biographer.

Figures 16 & 17: Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965) – Knight of the Order of the Garter. Born Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxford.

Fig 18: Duke of Marlborough Coat of Arms, Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxford.

Displaying the Order of the Knight of the Garter motto – ‘Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense’

Note the Double Headed Eagle again – a symbol of the Holy Roman Empire.


Past Knights of the Order of the Garter also included the following Holy Roman Emperors! [6][7]:

Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor                                                                      1368–1437

Albert V, Duke of Austria                                                                                 1397–1439

Later Albert II, Holy Roman Emperor

Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor                                                                 1415–1493

Maximilian, King of the Romans                                                                        1459–1520

Later Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor

Charles, Infant of Spain, Archduke of Austria and Duke of Burgundy     1500–1558

Later Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor

Ferdinand, Infant of Spain, Archduke of Austria                                                1503–1564

Later Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor

Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor                                                     1527–1576

Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor                                                                       1552–1612

Fig 19: Coat of Arms of Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor (1527 – 1576)

The Most Noble Order of the Garter – an order of chivalry founded by Edward III in 1348 and regarded as the most prestigious BRITISH order of chivalry. [15]

However, since the Order’s inception in 1348 there are a surprising number of apparently ‘FOREIGN’ members?

Of the thousand or so (~1011) Knights appointed to the Order of the Garter from 1348 to 2018 [7] the following are suggested as ‘NON-BRITISH’ from the author’s perspective:

Dates shown are of nomination or installation to the Order.

John IV, Duke of Brittany                                                                                 1375–1376

William I, Duke of Guelders and Jülich                                                  c.1399

William VI, Count of Holland                                                                c.1399

Albert I, Duke of Bavaria                                                                                  c. 1398

John I, King of Portugal                                                                                    c.1408

Eric VII, King of Denmark, Sweden and Norway                                             c.1405

Philip III, Duke of Burgundy                                                                             1422

Infante Peter, Duke of Coimbra                                                                        1427

Edward, King of Portugal                                                                                 1435

Gaston de Foix, Captal de Buch                                                                       1438–1439

Henry, Duke of Viseu                                                                           1442–1443

Álvaro Vaz de Almada, 1st Count of Avranches                                                1445

Afonso V, King of Portugal                                                                               1447

Alfonso V, King of Aragon and Naples                                                             1450

William, Duke of Brunswick                                                                              1450

Casimir IV, King of Poland                                                                               1450

Ferdinand I, King of Naples                                                                              1463

Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan                                                                      c.1463

Inigo d’Avalos, Count of Monteodorisio                                                            1467

Charles, Duke of Burgundy                                                                               1470

Federico da Montefeltro, Duke of Urbino                                                         1474

Ferdinand II, King of Aragon and Castile                                                          1480

(Ferdinand II (1452 –1516), called the Catholic, was King of Sicily

from 1468 and King of Aragon from 1479 until his death).

Hercules d’Este, Duke of Modena and Ferrara                                     1480

John II, King of Portugal                                                                                   1482

Alfonso, Duke of Calabria                                                                                1493

John, King of Denmark, Sweden and Norway                                       c.1499

Philip, Archduke of Austria and Duke of Burgundy                                            c.1503

Guidobaldo da Montefeltro, Duke of Urbino                                         c.1504

Manuel I, King of Portugal                                                                                1510

Giuliano de Medici, Duc de Nemours                                                    1514

Francis I, King of France                                                                                  1527

Anne de Montmorency, Duc de Montmorency                                     1532

Philip de Chabot, Comte de Neublanche                                                           1532

Henry II, King of France                                                                                   1551

Prince Philip of Spain                                                                            1554

Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy                                                                   1554

Adolf, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp                                                                       1560

Charles IX, King of France                                                                               1564

Francis, Duc de Montmorency                                                             1572

Henry III, King of France                                                                                 1575

(King of Poland 1573–1574)

Frederick II, King of Denmark and Norway                                                      1578

Johann Casimir of the Palatinate-Simmern                                                         1579

Henry IV, King of France                                                                                 1590

Frederick I, Duke of Württemberg                                                                    1597

Christian IV, King of Denmark and Norway                                                      1603

Ulrich, Duke of Holstein                                                                                    1605

Frederick V, Elector Palatine                                                                            1612

(King of Bohemia from 1619 to 1620)

Maurice de Nassau                                                                                           1612

(Later Maurice, Prince of Orange)

Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel                                                       1624

Claude de Lorraine, Duc de Chevreuse                                                             1625

Gustavus Adolphus, King of Sweden                                                    1627

Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange                                                                   1627

Charles I Louis, Elector Palatine                                                                        1633

Prince Rupert of the Rhine                                                                                1642

William II, Prince of Orange                                                                              1645

Bernard de Nogaret de Foix, Duc d’Épernon                                                    1645

Prince Maurice of the Rhine                                                                              1649

Edward, Count Palatine of Simmern                                                                  1649

Henri de la Trémoille, Prince de Taranto                                                            1653

William III, Prince of Orange                                                                1653

Frederick William I, Elector of Brandenburg                                          1654

John Gaspar Ferdinand de Marchin, Comte de Granville                                   1658

Christian, Prince Royal of Denmark                                                                   1662

(Later Christian V, King of Denmark and Norway)

Charles XI, King of Sweden                                                                             1668

John George II, Elector of Saxony                                                                    1668

Charles II, Elector Palatine                                                                                1680

Prince George of Denmark                                                                               1684

Frederic Herman de Schomberg, 1st Duke of Schomberg                                 1689

Frederick III, Elector of Brandenburg                                                   1690

(Later Frederick I, King in Prussia)

George William, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg                                     1690

John George IV, Elector of Saxony                                                                   1692

George Louis, Elector of Hanover                                                                     1701

Meinhardt Schomberg, 3rd Duke of Schomberg                                                1703

Prince George Augustus of Brunswick-Lüneburg                                               1706

(Later Prince of Wales; George II, King of Great Britain)

Prince Frederick Lewis of Brunswick-Lüneburg                                                1717

(Later Prince of Wales)

Prince Ernest Augustus of Brunswick-Lüneburg                                                 1717

(Later Duke of York and Albany)

William IV, Prince of Orange                                                                1733

Frederick, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel                                                             1741

Frederick III, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg                                       1741

Johann Adolf II, Duke of Saxe-Weissenfels                                                       1745

Charles William Frederick, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach                         1749

William V, Prince of Orange                                                                             1752

Ferdinand, Prince of Brunswick-Bevern                                                            1759

Adolphus Frederick IV, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz                         1764

Charles William Ferdinand, Hereditary Prince of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel          1765

Prince Ernest Augustus                                                                                     1786

(Royal Knight; later King of Hanover)

William IX, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel                                                            1786

Ernest II, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg                                                         1790

Alexander I, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias                            1813

Louis XVIII, King of France                                                                             1814

Francis I, Emperor of Austria                                                                1814

Frederick William III, King of Prussia                                                   1814

Ferdinand VII, King of Spain                                                                1814

William VI, Prince of Orange                                                                1814

(Later William I, King of the Netherlands)

Leopold George Frederick, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld                              1816

(Later Léopold I, King of the Belgians)

Frederick VI, King of Denmark                                                                        1822

John VI, King of Portugal                                                                                 1822

Charles X, King of France                                                                                1825

Nicholas I, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias                                           1827

Bernhard II, Duke of Saxe-Meiningen                                                   1830

William I, King of Württemberg                                                                        1830

Augustus William Maximilian Frederick Lewis,                                      1831

(Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel)

Carl, 3rd Prince of Leiningen                                                                             1837

Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha                                                        1838

Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha                                                                1839

(Later Albert, Prince Consort)

Frederick William IV, King of Prussia                                                   1842

Frederick Augustus II, King of Saxony                                                 1842

Louis Philippe, King of the French                                                                     1844

Ernest II, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha                                                       1844

Napoleon III, Emperor of the French                                                                1855

Victor Emmanuel II, King of Sardinia                                                    1855

(Later Victor Emmanuel II, King of Italy)

Abdul Medjid I, Sultan of Ottoman Empire                                                       1856

(First non-Christian member)

Frederick William Nicholas Charles, Crown Prince of Prussia                1858

(Later Frederick III, Emperor of Germany)

Peter V, King of Portugal                                                                                  1858

William I, King of Prussia                                                                                  1861

(Later German Emperor)

Prince Louis of Hesse and the Rhine                                                                  1862

(Later Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse)

Frederick William, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz                                    1862

Louis I, King of Portugal                                                                                   1865

Christian IX, King of Denmark                                                             1865

Louis III, Grand Duke of Hesse and the Rhine                                       1865

Leopold II, King of the Belgians                                                                        1866

Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein                                                   1866

Franz Joseph, Emperor of Austria                                                                     1867

Alexander II, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias                           1867

Abdul Aziz, Sultan of Ottoman Empire                                                 1867

Prince Leopold                                                                                                 1869

(Later Duke of Albany)

Peter II, Emperor of Brazil                                                                                1871

(First non-European member)

Naser al-Din, Shah of Persia                                                                             1873

George I, King of the Hellenes                                                             1876

Prince Wilhelm of Prussia                                                                                  1877

(Later Wilhelm II, Emperor of Germany)

Umberto, King of Italy                                                                         1878

Ernst August of Hanover, 3rd Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale        1878

Alexander III, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias                         1881

Oscar II, King of Sweden and Norway                                                             1881

Alfonso XII, King of Spain                                                                               1881

Albert, King of Saxony                                                                                     1882

William III, King of the Netherlands                                                                  1882

Prince Henry of Battenberg                                                                               1885

Rudolf, Crown Prince of Austria                                                                       1887

Prince Henry of Prussia                                                                                     1889

Charles, King of Württemberg                                                             1890

Victor Emmanuel, Prince of Naples                                                                   1891

(Later Victor Emmanuel III, King of Italy)

Prince Ernest Ludwig of Hesse                                                             1892

Carol, King of Romania                                                                                    1892

Grand Duke Nicholas Alexandrovich of Russia                                     1893

(Later Nicholas II, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias)

Prince Alfred of Edinburgh,                                                                               1894

(also Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha)

Charles I, King of Portugal                                                                                1895

Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark                                                                1896

(Later Frederick VIII, King of Denmark)

Frederick William Victor Augustus Ernest                                                         1901

(Crown Prince Imperial of Germany)

Alfonso XIII, King of Spain                                                                              1902

Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovich of Russia                                       1902

Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria                                                    1902

Prince Emanuel Philibert of Savoy, Duke of Aosta                                             1902

Luís Filipe, Prince Royal of Portugal                                                      1902

Prince Charles Edward, Duke of Albany                                                           1902

(also Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha)

Muzaffir al-Din, Shah of Persia                                                             1903

Wilhelm II, King of Württemberg                                                                      1904

Gustav, Crown Prince of Sweden                                                                     1905

(Later Gustav V, King of Sweden)

Mutsuhito, Emperor of Japan                                                                            1905

Frederick I, Grand Duke of Baden                                                                    1906

Haakon VII, King of Norway                                                               1906

Manuel II, King of Portugal                                                                               1909

Luitpold, Prince Regent of Bavaria                                                                    1911

Adolf Frederick V, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz                                   1911

Yoshihito, Emperor of Japan                                                                             1912

Christian X, King of Denmark                                                               1914

Albert I, King of the Belgians                                                                1914

Ferdinand, King of Romania                                                                             1924

Hirohito, Emperor of Japan                                                                               1929

Leopold III, King of the Belgians                                                                      1935

George II, King of the Hellenes                                                                         1938

Carol II, King of Romania                                                                                 1938

Prince Paul of Yugoslavia                                                                                  1939

Wilhelmina, Queen of the Netherlands                                                   1944

Frederick IX, King of Denmark                                                                        1951

Gustaf VI Adolf, King of Sweden                                                                     1954

Haile Selassie, Emperor of Ethiopia                                                                   1954

Juliana, Queen of the Netherlands                                                                     1958

Olav V, King of Norway                                                                                  1959

Baudouin, King of the Belgians                                                             1963

Paul, King of the Hellenes                                                                                 1963

Jean, Grand Duke of Luxembourg                                                                     1972

Margrethe II, Queen of Denmark                                                                      1979

Carl XVI Gustaf, King of Sweden                                                                     1983

Juan Carlos, King of Spain                                                                                1988

Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands                                                                     1989

Akihito, Emperor of Japan                                                                                1998

Harald V, King of Norway                                                                               2001

Felipe VI, King of Spain                                                                                   2017

Chapter 4 – Why the Order of the ‘Garter’?

The Official Narrative:-

Various legends account for the origin of the Order. The most popular involves the “Countess of Salisbury”, whose garter is said to have slipped from her leg while she was dancing at a court ball at Calais. When the surrounding courtiers sniggered, the king picked it up and returned it to her, exclaiming,

“Honi soit qui mal y pense!”

(“Shame on him who thinks ill of it!”), the phrase that has become the motto of the Order.

According to another legend, King Richard I was inspired in the 12th century by St George the Martyr while fighting in the Crusades to tie garters around the legs of his knights, who subsequently won the battle. King Edward supposedly recalled the event in the 14th century when he founded the Order.

For what its worth, both of the above explanations are quite ‘lame’ for such a prestigious Order of Knights (in the author’s opinion).

A More Plausible Explanation?

The ‘Order of the Garter’ associated with the ‘Leg of Italy’

Fig 20: The Mezzogiorno: Old Boot of Italy, featuring Garibaldi, 1868

Giuseppe Garibaldi (1807 – 1882) was an Italian general, politician, nationalist and Freemason.

Figs 21 and 22: Coat of Arms on Display at Chirk Castle, North Wales and a Cloister Roof Boss at Christ Church College, Oxford

Figs 23 and 24: Coats of Arms at the Main Gate for Hawarden Castle, North Wales, former residence of Sir William Gladstone (1925 – 2018), 7th Baronet, Knight of the Order of the Garter

The ‘Leg of Italy’ to be found in the cloister roof bosses, Christ Church College, Oxford, on one of the coats of arms on display at Chirk Castle, North Wales and displayed on both coats of arms at the main gate for Hawarden Castle, North Wales.

Chapter 5 – The Duke of Wellington

Knight of the Garter (KG)

Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, KG, GCB, GCH, PC, FRS (1 May 1769 – 14 September 1852), was an Anglo-Irish soldier and statesman who was one of the leading military and political figures of 19th-century Britain, serving twice as Prime Minister. His defeat of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 puts him in the first rank of Britain’s military heroes.

Fig 25: Arthur Wellesley (1769 – 1852), 1st Duke of Wellington KG

Fig 26: Coat of Arms of Arthur Wellesley (1769 – 1852), 1st Duke of Wellington [8] showing the motto for the Order of the Garter.

Fig 27: Duke of Wellington Battle Standard – St Pauls Cathedral Crypt, London

Note the Double Headed Eagle of the Holy Roman Empire again.

An interesting side note is that Arthur Wellesley had strong connections with Freemasonry – both his father and his brother served as Masters and they both became Grand Masters of the Grand Lodge of Ireland. [9]

Arthur himself was initiated into Trim Lodge (no 494), Ireland at the age of 21. [9]

Arthur Wellesley was created Marquis of Wellington on 18 August 1812 and was appointed Knight of the Order of the Garter on 4th March 1813. [10]

Fig 28: Caricature of the Duke of Wellington as a Wellington Boot (circa 1830)

Is this a humorous association of the ‘Order of the Garter’ with the ‘Leg of Italy’ for those in the cognoscenti?

Chapter 6 – The Triskelion

Everyone knows that standing on one leg can be a little unbalanced but what if stabilizers are added.

Fig 29: Flag of Sicily – the Triskelion is an ancient symbol of Sicily

Fig 30: Sicilian Coinage.

Fig 31: Note the proximity of Sicily to Italy

Fig 32: Coat of arms of the city of Füssen, Bavaria, Germany

The German name Füssen literally translates to ‘Feet’.

Füssen was settled in Roman times, on the Via Claudia Augusta, a road that leads southwards to northern Italy and northwards to Augusta Vindelicum (today’s Augsburg), the former regional capital of the Roman province Raetia.

In late antiquity, Füssen was the home of a part of the Legio III Italica, which was stationed there to guard the important trade route over the Alps.

Legio Tertia Italica (“Italian Third Legion”) was a legion of the Imperial Roman army founded in AD 165 by the emperor Marcus Aurelius (r. 161-80), for his campaign against the Marcomanni tribe. The cognomen Italica suggests that the legion’s original recruits were mainly drawn from Italy. The legion was still active in Raetia and other provinces in the early 5th century (Notitia Dignitatum, dated ca. 420 AD for Western Roman Empire entries). [14]

Then there is the symbol for the Isle of Man – the difference being that the legs are now armoured.

Fig 33: Isle of Man Symbol

The motto is ‘Quocunque Jeceris Stabit’, which is Latin and means: “whichever way you shall have thrown [it], it shall stand”

The Manx triskelion is known in the Manx language as tre cassyn “the three legs”. The symbol has been associated with the island since at least the 13th century. [11][12]

Fig 34: Coat of Arms for Sir John Stanley I, KG (c. 1350–1414) incorporating the Order of the Garter and the Triskelion.

Sir John Stanley I, KG (c. 1350–1414) was Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and titular King of Mann, the first of that name. The Stanley family later became the Earls of Derby and remained prominent in English history into modern times.

The author also came across the Triskelion on a monument in an old Scottish town on the River Tay – Dunkeld (once the capital of Scotland!).

The monument features both the ‘Compass and Squares’ of the Freemasons and the Triskelion?

Figures 35 and 36: Dunkeld Monument, Scotland featuring both the Compass and Squares of the Freemasons and the Triskelion

Fig 37: Dunkeld Monument, Scotland featuring both the Compass and Squares of the Freemasons and the Triskelion

Dunkeld is located approximately 14 miles NNW of Perth in Scotland.

Modern Perth is situated 3km downstream (on the River Tay) of the original Roman fort of Bertha. Bertha/Perth was the limit of the Roman Empire in Britain; the Romans never defeated the Picts at Scone (pronounced Scoon), the ancient capital of Scotland, only two miles north of Perth.

Fig 38: Modern Coat of Arms of Perth, Scotland featuring the Double-Headed Eagle of the Holy Roman Empire


Could the armoured legs of the Triskelion be stabilisers for the ‘Leg of Italy’ and the Holy Roman Empire?

Fig 39: Statue of Richard, Second Marquis of Westminster (1795 – 1869), Knight of the Order of the Garter, Chester, UK

Fig 40: Detail of the Garter Robes from the Statue of Richard, Second Marquis of Westminster (1795 – 1869), Chester, UK

Fig 41:  Signs on Bishop Lloyds Palace, Watergate Street, Chester, UK (carvings dated to 1615).

Signs include the Order of the Garter, the Triskelion, the Cross of St George and the Double Headed Eagle of the Holy Roman Empire.

Is the ‘Leg of Italy’ and the ‘Order of the Garter’ connected to anything else?

Fig 42: Freemasonic Initiation Rite for the First Degree – the First Step



Is the ‘New World Order’ the Holy Roman Empire Re-Incarnated?


(Like the Phoenix from the Ashes)






[1]        http://www.abbaziasanpaolo.org/stemma-abbazia-san-paolo-fuori-le-mura/

[2]        https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Luminary099/BURN_BABY_BURN–MASTER_IGNITION_ROUTINE.agc

[3]        http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/listings/Luminary131/BURN_BABY_BURN–MASTER_IGNITION_ROUTINE.agc.html

[4]        https://carynschulenberg.com/2015/11/the-stamp-act/

[5}       http://theearlymalaydoctors.blogspot.co.uk/2012_06_03_archive.html

[6]        http://www.heraldica.org/topics/orders/garterlist.htm

[7]        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Knights_and_Ladies_of_the_Garter

[8]        http://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk/news-grants/news/item/113-waterloo-and-wellington

[9]        https://freemasonrymatters.co.uk/famous-freemasons/famous-freemasons-arthur-duke-wellington-brother-arms/

[10]      http://www.historyhome.co.uk/pms/wellingt.htm

[11]      www.gov.im

[12]      https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_the_Isle_of_Man

[13]      https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stolpen_Amtshaus_(2)_2006-06-09.jpg

[14]      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legio_III_Italica

[15]      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Garter

Addendum Foot Note

Modern Cultural References – Sir Rolf Harris?

Fig 43: Sir Rolf Harris with his Portrait of the Queen

N.B. One of Queen Elizabeth II’s honorary titles – Princess of the Holy Roman Empire.

Ref http://www.holyromanempireassociation.com

Was Rolf Harris referring to the Triskelion when he sang about ‘Jake the Peg with the Extra Leg’?

Fig 44: Record Cover for ‘Jake the Peg’ (with the Extra Leg) by Rolf Harris

On a similar theme, was Rolf referring to the Knights Templars when he sang about ‘Two Little Boys’?

Fig 45: One of the Logo’s associated with the Knight’s Templar

Please follow and like us:

Iran nuclear deal dilemma: Six steps to World War Three

Emmanuel Macron warned of the possible beginning of World War Three should the United States withdraw from the nuclear deal with Iran. Let us imagine how events may develop if Donald Trump torpedoes this agreement on May 12.

The UN Security Council has been developing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly known as Iran’s nuclear program, for more than a decade. The plan says that Tehran should refuse from attempts to either build or possess nuclear weapons. In return, the international community undertakes to gradually lift international and national sanctions from Iran in trade, technology, finance and energy. However, President Donald Trump considers the “nuclear deal” with Iran insane and threatens to withdraw from it unilaterally.

Trump has a personal aversion to Iran

“The elimination of the symbolic nuclear agreement with Iran from 2015 would open a Pandora’s box – this could mean war,” Macron told the German newspaper Der Spiegel. European leaders used to reject the position of the United States on the subject. These days, however, they are ready to consider a few aspects that the deal does not embrace, such as, for example, the development of ballistic missiles – a weapon designed to deliver nuclear bombs to their targets.

Dmitry Abzalov, President of the Center for Strategic Communications, told Pravda.Ru that Donald Trump would most likely torpedo the Iran deal on Saturday. “Trump has an aversion to Iran, and Mueller’s investigation brings to light a few of those close to him. Secondly, Israel’s Netanyahu actively supports Donald Trump. The two politicians will try to take advantage of the Iranian issue to switch public attention to questions of foreign, rather than domestic policies,” the expert told Pravda.Ru.

As for the Europeans, they have economic interests in Iran, Abzalov believes. It goes about colossal investments in the Iranian fuel and energy complex and the joint German-French project to supply Airbus aircraft to Iran. “Torpedoing the Iran nuclear deal would strike a serious blow on European businesses that will fear secondary sanctions on the dollar market. USA’s unilateral withdrawal from the Iran deal will lead to higher tensions in the region,” Dmitry Abzalov told Pravda.Ru.

Six steps to WWIII: Trump torpedos Iran deal

Let us assume that Donald Trump will not extend the deal. This is the first step. Step two – Tehran will immediately resume uranium enrichment works. This was announced by the chief of Iran’s Atomic Organisation Ali Akbar Salehi and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani himself. Step three – Washington will reinstate the sanctions, while Russia and China fail to pass resolutions condemning Washington through the UN Security Council because of the silence of the Europeans. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and Turkey say that they also launch uranium enrichment operations to protect their people from the insanity of the Iranian regime.

Most likely, Israel has had nuclear weapons for a long time already. As a result, we will see four nuclear powers in the Middle East in a few years, where ISIS* is still struggling to survive. North Korea will be willing to revisit its nuclear ambition as well, and the principle of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons will go down in history forever.

The United States may prefer to start bombing Iranian nuclear facilities immediately after receiving a signal about the resumption of uranium enrichment works (step four). However, Iran keeps those objects hidden in mountains, and even a massive attack on the Islamic Republic will not be able to break Iran’s nuclear potential. The appearance of the bomb will be delayed, but the reaction to the attack will follow immediately.

Step five – Iran will block the Strait of Hormuz  – a transport corridor for almost one-third of global oil trade. Oil prices will skyrocket. Step six – Hezbollah will strike Israel, and the conflict will start snowballing with Syria and possibly, Lebanon and Palestine joining in. Iran can also help the Houthis in their struggle against Saudi Arabia, and the war on the Arabian Peninsula will erupt with a vengeance, which, in fact, will lead to the grand finale as Emmanuel Macron described it.

The US will benefit from such a development: USA’s shale oil and LNG will not be too expensive for Europe against the background of high world prices on oil. A new war in the Middle East will bring new loans and orders for the US defence industry. This would contribute to the growth of the American industry and create jobs, jobs, jobs, as Trump promised.

Preparations for a war with Tehran are in full swing: an American court ordered Iran to pay billion-dollar compensations to victims of 9/11 attacks; Benjamin Netanyahu promulgated intelligence materials to prove that Tehran had retained its military nuclear program after the conclusion of the nuclear deal. The ayatollah regime in Iran may collapse, unless, of course, Iran shows consolidated resistance.

Can Iran count on support from Russia and China? The two countries will most likely refuse to join international sanctions against Iran. However, such a humble move will not save Iran in the dollar-pegged global economy.  Moscow may thus lose a landmark ally in the region. This could be another long-term goal of the United States and Israel.

Lyuba Lulko (Stepushova)

See more at http://www.pravdareport.com/world/asia/07-05-2018/140921-iran_nuclear_deal-0/

Please follow and like us:

The Biggest Natural Pain Relief Cover-Up In World History

Are you sick and tired of your pain?

The side effects from pain relief pills?

And the unknown long-term risks that can bite you back later?

Well, that’s over now because I have great news for you about a safe, [all-natural secret to end your pain with no side effects.]

Our research team has blown the lid off:

The Biggest Natural Pain Relief Cover-Up In World History

Do NOT Take Any More Pain Relief Medicine Until You
Watch This Head-Spinning Video

It all started when the famous CBS-TV show “60 Minutes” did a report in which experts said drug companies were trying to keep this natural pain relief miracle hidden from the public because they could NOT patent it and make a fortune from it.

The big greedy drug companies convinced and connived Mainstream Medicine to “Blacklist” this natural pain ender …
even though this product with its “magic drops” safely ends even the worst pain anywhere in your body in 54 seconds with no side effects,
no stomach upset or stomach pain and no long term unknown health risks.

But even as powerful and rich as the big drug companies are, many of the rich and famous, and Hollywood Stars like James Coburn and James Culp have gotten these magic drops and swear by it.

And so do world-famous doctors including Dr. Oz, Dr. Mercola, Dr. Julian Whitaker, Dr. Al Sears and others.

Click here now to watch the FREE short, informative video.

Even Sports Illustrated magazine did a feature article on this natural pain-relief miracle.

The New York Times called it “the closest thing to a health wonder”.

Leading institutions including Harvard, The Mayo Clinic and The Cleveland Clinic hail this discovery that you have never heard about before.

It virtually turns your body’s pain switch OFF.  It works within seconds.

And, the beauty is, unlike Tylenol, Advil and Aleve, it has NO side effects or long term unknown risks that can bite you back with who-knows-what later.

Watch this video while you still can.  I don’t know how long this will be up. The big powerful drug companies don’t want you to see this.  They may try to get it banned.

Click here to watch this exciting free video now

Please follow and like us:

The Only Option Remaining for the NWO Globalist Cabal is: World War III

Deep State wants war.
The Shadow Government wants war.
The Military-Industrial Complex wants war.

The CFR, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group want war.
The RIIA, LBMA and SERCO want war.
The Committee of 300 and Black Nobility want war.

Israel wants war.
Saudi Arabia wants war.
The United Kingdom and France want war.

Corporate America wants war.
The U.S. Congress wants war.
The Trump Administration wants war.

Why do all of these powerful entities want war?

Because there’s really no other way out of their unsustainable predicaments except by triggering a full-blown World War III scenario.  Truly, the New World Order globalist cabal now finds itself in an untenable situation as it grows more desperate by the day.

The rapidly deteriorating state of international affairs, as well as domestic affairs for many nations, stands as a testament to this ongoing and engineered clash of civilizations.  What follows is a list of serious developments which spell the final end of the British-American Empire.  And these are just a few of the major events clearly signaling the end of the era.

• Iran’s decoupling with US dollar and transition to the Euro

• Unlawful attacks of unprovoked military aggression by Israel on Syria

• Occupation of Syria by the U.S. military and C.I.A.

• Attacks on Syrian government forces by the US-led coalition

• PM Benjamin Netanyahu gives fake presentation on Iran’s nuclear program

• Incessant warmongering by NATO and its proxies

• False flag chemical attacks staged by Western powers

• Operation Gladio attacks carried out worldwide

• Extreme volatility of the stock market especially the NYSE

• Repatriation of gold by several G20 nations

• Multi-decade institutional downward manipulation of gold price

• Unprecedented explosion of crytocurrencies and their extreme volatility

• Deep State plots and conspiracies executed daily in broad daylight

• Soft coup being carried out against the POTUS

• ZIRP and NIRP are the new normal throughout the G8

• Escalating trade war between the U.S. and China

• Imminent Brexit and Anglo-American trade wars with European Union

• Perpetual persecution of Russia and her BRICS allies

• Russia and China form close trading relationship with massive energy contracts

• Wave of Russian diplomat murders and arson fire spree throughout Motherland

• Unparalleled expulsion of Russian diplomats by 30 nations based on false accusations

• US Ambassador to UN Haley exposes herself as hardcore warmonger and Israel Firster

• Neocon Zionist John Bolton appointed as National Security Advisor

• Neocon puppet Mike Pompeo appointed to Secretary of State

• Torture advocate Gina Hapsel appointed to CIA Director

• War cabinet shoehorned into place by Trump after peacemakers fired

Problem past, perilous future

First and foremost, the only way TPTB can get away from their utterly corrupt and criminal past is to destroy all the records… and erase the memory.  Even then, digital records will surely exist for the foreseeable future.  Nevertheless, the cabal is now compelled to disappear their warmongering history so that present and future generations are unaware.

The pervasiveness of the Internet, with so much incriminating truth now available, has necessitated this initiative.  The only practical way for TPTB to accomplish this goal is during the predictable fog of war that would inevitably predominate during a Third World War.  For instance, if martial law was declared in the USA, adequate cover could be provided for shredding every sensitive file deemed dangerous to the cabal.

As for the future, the only way forward for their New World Order, as defined by a totalitarian One World Government is, again, a Third World War.  Only such a devastating and global-scale armed conflict will provide them the opportunity to create sufficient chaos worldwide — in the spirit of Ordo ab chao (i.e. order out of chaos) — so they can foist a One World Government upon the world community of nations.

KEY POINT: In reality the New World Order has been with US for well over 100 years.  Ever since the Federal Reserve System was established in the United States of America, the NWO globalists have effectively ruled the world.  Even before the FED was formed in 1913, the bankster elites have governed nations, controlled societies, and managed trade and commerce the world over.


Now here they are in 2018 and with their backs are up against the wall.

They have nowhere to go.  They have nowhere to hide.

The Internet has been humming 24/7 since the last century and that hum of damning information is only getting louder by the day.  The unparalleled explosion of truth about those who have ruthlessly controlled the entire planetary civilization is now reverberating around the globe.

Whether one researches the Rothschilds or the Rockefellers on the World Wide Web, the same search results indicate that these banksters finally got caught in the same web of deceit and deception.  Most are unaware that these two banking families are but fronts for the numerous Illuminati families that have operated surreptitiously since the Black Nobility gained notoriety post-Marco Polo (i.e. lated 13th century).

As a matter of historical fact, the real perpetrators behind the World Wars and Great Depressions have been revealed like never before.  Therefore, the NWO perps are between a rock and a hard place with not a whit of wiggle room.  So there’s no getting out of it this time…except, so they think, by starting a Third World War.

Of course, there is also the obsessive advancement of their NWO agenda.  Only by subjugating Russia (and China) can total world domination come closer to reality.  In fact, both world wars were started to prevent a powerhouse alliance from being formed between Germany and Russia.  The 20th century globalists knew from playing the Great Game that such an eventuality must be averted if global hegemony was to be achieved.  For more details, see: STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination

Why Russia?

The Deep State now fears a “partnership for peace” between the United States and Russia more than anything else.  It used to fear the natural alliance between Russia and Germany, since the Anglo-American domination of the world would be genuinely threatened by such a powerful geopolitical relationship.  The two World Wars were engineered to pit Russia against Germany in order to preclude such a bloc from forming. The same Neocon cabal has been very busy setting up Europe for yet a Third World War by manipulating Merkel’s government (as well as the entire European Union) against Putin’s Kremlin.  The immigrant crisis that began with the wars in the Middle East and North Africa was literally manufactured to destabilize Europe as a precursor to World War III.

However, in the wake of the Trump presidency, Deep State now has a much bigger ‘problem’—the very real prospect of a United States-Russian Federation entente.  For this reason, the C.I.A. and MSM (mainstream media) have been beating the war drums like never before.  Russia has, overnight, become the whipping boy for everything wrong with the Democratic Party as well as the scapegoat for every major (and fictitious) security lapse in the USA.  The U.S. Intelligence Community will continue to fabricate patently false stories about the Trump Administration with respect to Russia as pre-emptive strikes to make any meaningful dialogue politically precarious.  At the request of the C.I.A., the MSM will also continue to publish fake news and naked propaganda in order to greatly inflame anti-Russian sentiment.

Whenever the Neocon cabal wants war, they pull out all the stops.  However, in 2017, their New World Order is under serious assault around the globe and war has become an apparent necessity.  Populist movements and nationalist revolutions are springing up like mushrooms across the planet. After the controlled demolition of the Global Economic and Financial System, the cabal considers war — World War III — as their only real option (just as they created the Great Depression to set the stage for World War II).  Inciting extreme Russophobia has been the means to starting the real big wars. World War III will be no different, unless Trump and Putin meet in broad daylight and declare Deep State the archenemy of We the People everywhere.  That’s the short story, now read on for the extended back story.
(Source: What’s really behind all the fabricated anti-Russia hysteria?)

Trump card

A careful reading of this short reality check indicates that a major war is but a foregone conclusion.  Whether it develops into a global conflict is less likely because there are major players who will not be goaded into world war.  That doesn’t mean the warmongers won’t try however.

There is one wild card in this analysis which has escaped attention.  It’s actually a Trump card which can significantly alter the current trajectory toward war.  That would be President Donald J. Trump.  He campaigned fervently as a peace candidate and his base will hold him to his word.

Hence, whether you are an avid Trump supporter or ardent Trump detractor, every peacemaker in highly encouraged to pray for his edification.  For his determination to keep his promises and keep the peace.  For his willingness to make peace wherever he can; and to refrain from prosecuting any and all wars.

President Trump must not fail in this regard.  He must resist being used as Israel’s puppet.  The POTUS especially has an obligation to the American people (and nations of the world) to investigate any false flag attacks before he reacts without evidence.  Otherwise, he risks taking the country to war based on a lie such as this: Major False Flag Ship Attack on U.S. Navy in Mediterranean Planned as Pretext for World War III


Bottom Line: 2018 is the “Year of Endings” even if Trump doesn’t drop another MOAB.

May, June, and July of 2018 are destined to be highly consequential.  The world community of nations is facing its greatest challenge since World War II.

Those who have dictated the destiny of the human race up for centuries are likewise confronted with prodigious and unforeseen obstacles.  And their plight only worsens by the day.  The power elite have quite deliberately created this highly combustible situation.

As a result, globalists are bumping up against nationalists with increasing frequency and ferocity.  Facing existential threats as they are, the globalists have everything to lose.  And the One World Government they seek is but pipe dream.

As long as the American people keep their right to bear arms, they stand as the last major bulwark against the curse of globalization.  However, they must also retain their right to freedom of speech.  This is why they were ratified as the First and Second Amendments; true liberty can only be guaranteed with both firmly in place.

May God Bless America!

State of the Nation
May 2, 2018

Special Note

The state of the global geopolitical chessboard has never been so precarious.  2018 is certainly shaping up to host a defining moment for humanity.   Circumstances are now conspiring to make sure that specifically timed events occur—monumental events!  Only in this way can much needed release and resolution begin to take place.

As a year of great consequence, it’s quite likely that 2018 will become an epochal year of endings.  Not only will this year of completions bring extraordinary change, the international order will begin the process of profound and fundamental transformation.  Right now, however, we are still in the calm before the storm.

Therefore, it has never been so important to stay centered, grounded and focused.  Once the trigger is pulled a whole series of dominoes will fall, each one crashing into the next.  Only when the dust settles will it will be possible to properly assess the situation and respond accordingly.  Until then, the time is getting shorter by the minute so vigilance is the buzzword for the next few months.

Please follow and like us:

THE WORLD MUST KNOW. #PureEvil #HellOnEarth

Since 2011, more than 18,000 Syrian human beings have had their organs harvested. Men, women and children. And the mainstream media has been silent. No one is doing anything to stop it. Because it’s business: Human trafficking, Satanic ritual abuse, organ harvesting. #PureEvil.

“So do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.” Matthew 10:26

Please follow and like us:

IN DEPTH: Syria stuns world, thwarts US attack But is there something else going on beneath the surface?

The Syrian Arab Army has stunned the world with its successful defense of Damascus, assets, and military installations in the early hours of April 14th, 2018.  The attacks by the US and UK consisted of over a hundred missiles, were carried out without UN Security Council approval and are illegal in international law. This confirms once again the status of the two Atlanticist regimes as criminal offenders of the highest order. The failure of the US attack may have any number of explanations, ranging from ineptitude, inability to project, a well maintained and upgraded Syrian army,  or even a lack of American resolve.


Damascus skies erupt with anti-aircraft fire and smoke as the U.S. launches an attack on Syria targeting different parts of the Syrian capital Damascus, early Saturday, April 14, 2018. Damascus has been rocked by loud explosions that lit up the sky with heavy smoke as U.S. President Donald Trump announced airstrikes in retaliation for the country’s alleged use of chemical weapons. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)


Of course in war, the ‘coordinated attack’ is so basic that it goes without being explained. But the Trump administration attacks on Syria appear coordinated in a very different way. Were the attacks coordinated with the Russians?

There would be a pattern of coordination with these attacks, if this attack was also coordinated. These are becoming standard ‘response’ type attacks, we had the feckless US attack on the Syrian air base a year ago, the Shayrat missile strike on April 7th, 2017, where nothing really hit. At the time, we suggested and were not alone to suggest, that something was off with the Shayrat attack as well.

It appeared the US had communicated the target specs to the Russians who relayed them to the Syrians. It became a matter of the historical record that the US did in fact consult the Russians on target locations in order to minimize the risk of hitting Russian personnel, etc. Damage was close to nil, six planes damaged and with a single pock-mark in the run-way being fixed within an hour or so. Casualties listed at about 9 dead, and while there’s no particular reason to doubt this number, crazier things have been claimed in the past.

Please make the Fort Russ project viable through your support  of J. Flores’ Patreon, by following this link here 

The Russians at the time considered that the “combat effectiveness” of the April 2017 attack was “extremely low”. Of 59 launched, only 23 missiles hit the base destroying six aircraft, and the other 36 could not be accounted for. At the time, experts wondered whether the US had used this opportunity to use expired Tomahawk missiles, or even whether the US was pulling its punches.

In a similar attack last night that was announced similarly by the sitting US president, we have last night’s laser light and fireworks show.



Now looking again at how this has gone down, in the early hours of April 14th, 2018, we have the US firing – according to what the Russian General Staff issued in a statement – a total of 103 cruise missiles from which 71 had been intercepted by Syria, adding that no government military airfield had been damaged as a result of the attack.

Setting ‘rates’ aside, what really matters is what was hit. If the tactic was to overwhelm the defense systems than a high intercept rate would be expected as a possibility. If the airfields were the strategically significant target of the attack, then it certainly was a failure.

Is the US simply not capable of more than this? Was it pulling its punches? Was this chiefly a cathartic attack which can now bring to rest an openly exposed to story that the Brits are failing embarrassingly and repeatedly in their  staged attacks at home and in Syria?

In terms of capacity, we showed a map with the positions of US and Russian naval ships in the eastern Mediterranean,


So in terms of capacity, it would appear that in the event of an escalated attack that would draw Russia in – something which apparently the US wanted to avoid – that there is a counterbalance of Russian naval force in the region and in between the land-mass and the Atlanticist naval forces. There is a decent argument from this alone, that the US simply lacks the capacity to project from their location and hit the targets. Then why carry it out?

And at the same time, today’s attack may satiate some of the forces within the Atlanticst power structure, and serve a cathartic purpose. Now moderates can tell  hawks, ‘there you’ve got your attack’. Now what the media has been on about, and what the majority congressional pro-war caucus of sorts has been demanding, can be put to rest for a moment. The divisions in American society, however, are deeper than this. We saw a similar situation with the attack a year ago. There was an alleged chemical attack in Syria, which invariably involved the foreign intelligence and operations wing of the government – like the CIA – and then there was media and congressional pressure on Trump (that time they spoke of impeachment), and then we had his ordered attack on the Syrian air base.

And just as with a year ago, we saw some wing of the US power establishment working through the CIA to create these false flag attacks, that are also part hoaxed or use hoaxed evidence, which force the US president to order some attack. And now, as then, these attacks ended up not being very impressive.

RevContent InArticle SOLO

In the backdrop of all of this is a president who publicly opposes escalation from day one and has moved to declare the conflict over, indicating a redeployment of forces to the US-Mexico border, and in so doing, returning national discourse to domestic issues. And then, and now, has been some success at directing American public attention away from domestic matters for a moment and back to the Syria question, and foreign terrorism by extension.

What’s additionally interesting now, is that just as with the April 2017 attack, Russia makes an official announcement involving the use or sale of its S-300 or S-400 defense system. In statements recorded by Tass, the spokesman of the General Staff continued:

“A few years ago, we refused to supply S-300 air defense systems to Syria due to the request of some of our Western partners. Taking into account what happened, we consider it possible to return to this issue. And not only with regard to Syria, but with regard to other states,”.

In their statement, they included that Syrian air defense forces had successfully intercepted all twelve of the cruise missiles which had been used to attack the Dumayr military airfield, the base is used to support the army campaign on Eastern Ghouta.

We find an important narrative here that Russian air defenses were not used to repel the missile strike, being said both in passing reference to the Syrian army’s work, and with a direct statement. The subsequent framing by Russian media is not simply stenography, but in fact narrative construction.

Please make the Fort Russ project viable through your support  of J. Flores’ Patreon, by following this link here 

“Russia’s air defenses haven’t been used to repel the missile strike on the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic”, the military said. This is very clear, and mirrors de-escalation discourse. The US appears to have decided not to directly engage with Russian targets.

“None of the cruise missiles launched by the US and its allies entered the zone of responsibility of the Russian air defenses, covering objects in Tartus [naval facility] and Hmeymim [airbase located in Latakia province],” the Russian Defense Ministry added. And is this not convenient?

“Russian air defense systems at the Hmeymim and Tartus bases have timely found and controlled all the missile launches from naval and air vehicles of the US and Britain,” the Russian General Staff stated to Tass. They added that they hadn’t recorded French aviation’s participation in the attack, which is also interesting to note for several reasons, beyond any truth value it may have.

The obvious message is the important message here – Russia and the US did not engage, so do not expect a Russian ‘retaliation’ militarily.  The Syrian Arab Army will continue its clean-up campaign and Russia will pursue diplomacy on multiple fronts and in multiple vectors.

This doesn’t rule out that Russia won’t escalate in other ideas, as a ‘cold’ response. That is a long established Russian method, which reflect sovereign prerogative.

Again this goes in hand with the idea that there are serious divisions within the US power structure over how to manage Syria, in fact on any number of questions substantively, all together.

Russia has just announced that it had evidence that Atlanticists, in particular in the UK government, had fabricated parts of its evidence of the alleged Syrian chemical attack.

While the Syrian Arab Army no doubt performed optimally, the history of US and Russian coordination which limited the scope of the attacks in more ways than one, and the similar circumstances surrounding this attack, lead us to lend credence to the possibility that this attack too reflected some degree of coordination and limitation.

Overall, the idea that ineffective US attacks reflect some divisions in the US power establishment, isn’t far fetched. At the same time, more standard explanations should first be given weight. It has been written about for some time, that US power projection is dwindling. These are matters of relative development – country’s defense capacities have increased in the last few decades, and the problems with the US’s predominant military doctrines have been exposed.

The questions that remain open are – to what extent will today’s attacks satiate elements of the US elite and open up the possibility for diplomacy?

What is the general consensus on the cost/benefit to winning the Syrian conflict from the point of view of American elites?

Will successive direct US attacks on Syria also follow this pattern of low success? What are the real reasons for this?


Please follow and like us:

Idiocy Is Bringing The End Of The World

Paul Craig Roberts

Here is Jason Ditz on the coming end of the world:


Vladimir Soloviev explains the failure of Putin’s policy of appeasement:


If you were the president of France or the prime minister of the UK, would you permit criminally insane Washington to drag you into military conflict with Russia? https://www.infowars.com/get-ready-russia-trump-takes-to-twitter-to-threaten-strike-on-syria/

I didn’t think so. I wouldn’t either. So what’s with Macron and May? What’s with the French and British governments? What’s with the French and British media? I read recently that former UK Labour prime minister Tony Blair is now worth $100 million, his payoff for lying to the UK government and people in order to support the George W. Bush regime’s invasion of Iraq. Have Macron and May been promised the same?

It makes no sense for the UK and French governments to make themselves targets of a military power against which they have no possibility of defense. It makes no sense that their peoples and media sit silently while one French president and one British prime minister endanger not only France and the UK but the entirety of Europe. What’s with the European Union? There is only silence as Europe, and the world with it, are taken to the brink of annihiliation. This makes no sense. https://www.globalresearch.ca/taking-the-world-to-the-brink-of-annihilation/5635456

People in Ghouta, doctors in Ghouta, and Russian experts who have arrived on the scene report that there is no sign of any chemical attack. Not only did Syria not use chemical weapons against the civilians that it liberated, there was no chemical attack, not even a false flag one staged by the US supported mercenaries who have been driven out of Ghouta by the Syrian Army. In other words, the chemical attack is entirely a hoax.

To keep the hoax from being confirmed by independent investigation, Washington vetoed a UN Security Council resolution to send in neutral experts to evaluate the claim of chemical attack. Why would Washington prevent an investigation that would prove Washington’s allegation? Clearly, Washington would only prevent an investigation that would disprove the false allegation. There is no doubt whatsoever that Washington’s allegation is false and is being used as an excuse to force Russia to fight or to accept Washington’s hegemony in the Middle East.

What if there was a chemical attack? Why does it matter to people who are killed whether it was by bullets, bombs, missiles, or chemicals? Why is it so bad to use chemicals instead of Hellfire missiles? Why is it OK for Washington and Israel to blow up schools, hospitals, weddings, funerals, market places, and homes full of women and children with missiles, but not OK to kill people with chemicals? Why is it worth starting World War 3 over a hoax chemical weapons attack or a real one?

Americans, for the most part a clueless people, have no awareness of the risk that the criminally insane government in Washington is taking with their lives. What if the Russians mean what they say and do not again turn the other cheek and back down? What happens if Russia replies to force with force?

Why is it that only a few Internet sites are asking this question?

Please follow and like us: